100!!! Congratz Veta, another 100 post!

FUCK, I fail!

Three questions to skrum:

1) Would you consider yourself as a classic Republican (white, male, older than 50, with a conservative family background) who has always voted for the GOP in important federal elections?

2) Do you think that anyone could ever change your mind about political topics regarding issues linked to party politics, especially when your opinion is the opinion of the GOP?

3) Would you consider yourself as an ideologist?


Please answer as brief as possible (if possible: yes/no answers)

Define what a neutral source is and look a every source to see if satisfies this definition of neutrality. Given any definition of a neutral source, I bet to you nothing will satisfy it.

Vash:

No one has posited the existence of a neutral source. And you were the one who said we should talk about taxes. So get back to the point.

1. No.
2. Yes.
3. What's an ideologist?

@moon
Silly questions, it is pretty obvious skrum is a social conservative libertarian with a firm belief in a strict interpretation of the constitution and states rights. None of those beliefs would fall in line with the current GOP except maybe his social beliefs.

@skrum
moon meant to ask if you were an ideologue.

@vash
don't try to 100 spam threads that are obviously going to make 100.

As far as I knew ideologist and ideologue were completely equivalent?

Maybe ideologue being American and ideologist British?
But definitely something a professor should know?!

And Sam, I basically asked the questions because of 2).

Otherwise I don't quite see the point of skrum contributing to those discussions...