Forum
Favoritism between mods and players and players and mods.
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 8:21 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST
Mostly on 2k and generally with players who've been around for a while. Mods treat them like they don't do anything wrong and when someone like me of course says anything. I'm delusional . or crazy or just being LL. Or they don't care what I have to say. I just sat in a game. Where miss click had 2 lands and was a 1 hit and easy out. What do they do? Full table on 2k. Jurgen sitting at the table and I get told sorry by brown who I had flagged to and so had miss click, he hit me after I said I flag. Miss click gets 4th place from 2 lands all game because brown decided to accept his 2 land flag instead of my 6 land flag when miss click was a 1 hit out. How is that not favoritism? Wiped out all the other players before killing him for 4th place. I was bigger then he was even when I flagged.and yet was denied everything and any chance. And it's just handed over to miss click.
|
|
StormLord wrote
at 11:30 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST The quicker you realize this game is built on game-to-game favours, the better.
But, the game you talk about, in fact, shows the opposite. Not accepting flags in order to secure a better position is perfectly acceptable, in fact it should be encouraged. He was right to accept reds flag and not yours. The only mistake he made was not to 8v4 you in round 4. |
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:33 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST I expect all mods to agree with Jurgen that there's NOTHING wrong same as I expect that every player who is normally in the top 25 would agree too. That just proves my point more how flawed our mods are that they allow players to be given positions. (given positions isn't that a funnel?) Maybe everyone should start doing just like brown and miss click. Not kill the guy when you can and then let them steal a position someone else deserved! I'm sure the lesser players will get punished and the big old players will get the reward of continued gaming.
|
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:35 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST The problem storm Lord. Is the fact he didn't accept my flag. And kill miss click it couldve put him in a better position. Having me between him and purple. And me fight Jurgen. And he spreads threw he could be easily gotten first and what position did he get? Tell me?
|
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:36 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST You don't pay attention. I attempted to flag for max position of 3. Just to fight Jurgen and help then achieve higher instead he fuck himself for 3. By fucking me and not killing miss click.
|
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:37 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST I guess I see you favor their side as well
|
|
|
StormLord wrote
at 11:43 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST Had he killed red, his 8 would be stuck. Had he accepted your flag - purp and blue would have countered.
Your not wrong that game-to-game favours occur, this is just a poor example of one. |
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:46 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST I flagged to purple if you didn't watch the replay. He had nothing to counter only a need to fight brown and blue. To achieve a higher position. And no. His 8 wouldn't have been stuck.
|
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:49 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST And if you noticed. He even said that he was joking about flagging. I said I still flagged. Which left him a way out thru brown. And even if he chose not to kill brown at that moment. Brown couldn't have hit him either.
|
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:50 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST Brown could've killed red I mean. Ffs.
|
|
|
Lalita Lani wrote
at 11:52 AM, Tuesday January 26, 2016 EST But you do agree there was favors in this game here? I played on an alt nobody knew. While they talk shit about me before the game starts. Tried not to lose my cool until they favored miss click in the game. The middle for me could've been Browns advantage in achieving a higher position. But he chose to settle for less in order to help his buddy not lose points.
|