Forum
Veta
|
greekboi wrote
at 4:23 PM, Wednesday March 23, 2011 EDT
Do you really think that Republicans are that different from Democrats? Obviously on the surface you have your major differences in ideology, but the fact that you support Obama so loyally and think that Republicans are so very evil makes me think you are quite ignorant. Did you not notice the whole launching 122 missiles into Libya thing? What's up with that imperialist bullshit? Oh and how bout the whole economic "stimulus" plan? Can you really argue that it was any different than Bush's bailout? Throughout his campaign, Barack emphasized how he would put the money into the hands of the people, not the other way around. What about all his talks about moving away from the heated bipartisanship and bringing about cooperation to advance our national agenda? Bottom line is that Obama is full of shit. Everything he says is a load, and if you don't see past that, you are a moron. You guys need to get over your political parties, they mean nothing. Start voting on the issues.
Anyways, I know this hasn't been the most articulate post in the world, but I'll leave with you a quote from 2007: ?The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation. History has shown us time and again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the Legislative branch.? I'll let you guess who said it. |
|
Tourney Champ wrote
at 10:02 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT it is reasonable to steal, murder, lie, etc at times. the snake convinced adam to do the first sin through reason. reason is good so long as it doesnt violate gods laws. we embrace this line of thought in modern society.
reason does not equal faith. faith is the point of romans 9 |
|
montecarlo wrote
at 10:05 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT kreuz/skrum yall are having a failure to communicate due the differences between american english and church english. the word "test" in a scientific community is far different from the word "test" in the biblical sense. youre both right.
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 10:05 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT God invented death. So it would be natural that God would set up the rules about who (other than Himself) is authorized, or directed, to kill, and when.
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 10:07 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT Kreuz:
To have repeatablility in a test, and the test requires consent of the testee, then the testee has to consent to each repetition of the test. What is the problem? |
|
jurgen wrote
at 10:08 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT any proof that god invented death? citing bible doesn't count
because that's like proving sauron created the one ring because it is written in "the book" |
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 10:09 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT the placebo effect is a scientifically proven fact
praying has the same placebo effect |
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 10:09 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT oh dear god, i couldn't bite my lip any longer and had to join one of those crazy politic/religion discussions
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 10:12 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT Any disproof that God did not invent death? Quotes from the Bible, or anything else, are OK.
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 10:12 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT "God invented death. So it would be natural that God would set up the rules about who (other than Himself) is authorized, or directed, to kill, and when."
So God places one of his main rules as not killing, and then chooses not to lead by example and kill. The lack of accountability on a being that does exactly what he tells others not to is nonsensical. Why is God allowed to kill without repercussion? Your answer, of course, will be "because he is God". |
|
mr Kreuzfeld wrote
at 10:15 AM, Tuesday March 29, 2011 EDT "To have repeatablility in a test, and the test requires consent of the testee, then the testee has to consent to each repetition of the test. "
how do f*ck do I ask gravity if I can test it??? you are confusing medical tests with science. scientific tests have nothing to do with getting permission. if you want to prove that a human cannot walk without the kneecaps you don't have to ask nice, you can just remove them. like dr mengele did. I need noone concent to test their existence, I do that by gathering the light that is emitted from them, with these small holes I have that are designed for the purpose. really skum, you being a statestican an all, I expected waaaaay better from you. If God was testable, then he would have been disproven ALONG time ago. so, still in scientific terms, god is not testable if he/she has to choose if he wants to give the result or no. |