Well, whatever the reason is for having an average not equalling 50 on a 100-scale of a thing that is meant to be random, it just shows the stat is bullshit.

Estimate luck per dice. Rolling 18 with those 3 dice is damn lucky though you probably still lose to that 8 stack... Failing your suicide sucks - and is considered luck winning 2v5... Win/Loss and Luck is semantics and thus not computable (can be proofed using the pumping lemma iirc).

Here's an idea:
Average score should be 3.5 on a perfectly random dice. So any roll below 3.5 could be considered "unlucky" while any roll above 3.5 would be "lucky". That way you just see if your dice are doing right on average. It won't say anything on the distribution and effect of course. Average rolling per game would something nice to know I think.

BTW, is there a reported 48 by now? I did myself and observe an 8 (with an 8stack), but haven't heard of a 48 so far.

I've seen 2 48s and at least one 8 has been reported on the forums. I've also witnessed 2 8v2 losses and 1 2v8 win (it was mine).

screens or gtfo : P

lol

screens or gtfo : P

the answer of this question is; becouse we dont living in matrix

ta i rolled an 8 , its in the forums...but iv heard of a lot of 8s be4.