Forum
Who cares about PGAs?
|
blondes_win wrote
at 8:40 PM, Tuesday May 25, 2010 EDT
For starters, I would like to say that I have been f'ed over by PGAs. As a matter of fact, almost everyone on this site had been on the bad end of an unsaid truce (unless they only play 0 tables).
But I feel that all of this hype over PGAs is so trivial. Kdice, I have to say, is most like an anarchy. With so few mods, you can't expect much too happen. Therefore, making a post or complaining about every PGA you encounter is a waste of all of our time. You just have to learn to deal with it. All of the tantrums have led to a paranoia on this site where everyone is screaming "PGA!" at everyone else. For example, Happy and Crys are at a table (who are genuinely a nice people). Do I expect them to kill each other early on. Hell-to-the-no. Everyone PGAs, can we actually do something (like get more mods instead of REMOVING them) or just get over it; because complaining is getting really old. |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 21 - 25 of 25
|
Troy11 wrote
at 8:23 PM, Thursday May 27, 2010 EDT second last word is supposed to be ( to )
|
|
ryansucks321 wrote
at 9:01 PM, Thursday May 27, 2010 EDT Macho - the only reason you are fighting 4 - 7th is because you've not formed your own PGA. That's your own fault.
The anti-PGA belief is based on an arbritrary sense of fairness. PGAs are fair, and just because you or anyone else says they are not doesn't make it so. You had equal opportunity to create a PGA. You place is not decided. PGAs require as much skill or more than no PGAs. No PGA means relying on luck. |
|
|
Troy11 wrote
at 10:25 PM, Thursday May 27, 2010 EDT maybe if they created team games, pga wouldnt occur...thrax..get on that
|
|
|
ryansucks321 wrote
at 12:41 AM, Friday May 28, 2010 EDT Maybe if you all stopped assuming PGAs were bad, kdice would be fun.
I challenge anyone to develop a coherent argument that PGAs are bad w/o relying on "they are bad because I say so". |
|
Shevar wrote
at 5:03 AM, Friday May 28, 2010 EDT A statement containing the word "bad" is not suitable for a coherent argument, since consensus about what is "bad" is unlikely to exist between author and reader.
|
