Forum
does kdice need more punishment from mods?
|
the full monte wrote
at 2:49 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
this is a serious discussion.
i check out kdice.com/advisorLog about once a week, and have been pleased to see how active the xsketch mod Lei is in punishing cheating over in xsketch land. fairly frequently you will see an entire page of advisorLog filled with him catching people who write answers, who share answers over instant messaging, or people who abuse the chatbox or username choice. and he bans the annoying username people several times in a row as soon as they create new alts. i applaud this effort. i havent been to xsketch recently, but im sure Lei's vigor has a positive influence on the community. i played a few days of gpokr this month, and was pleased to see that the community there also realizes the punishment of cheating. when i used to play a long time ago, it was commonplace to transfer winnings between alt accounts. apparently that has now been deemed a punishable offense (makes sense), and people only transfer winnings as discretely as possible because they know they will lose all of the winnings if a mod catches them doing it. what im concerned with in kdice is that the mods dont (or arent allowed to) punish pga. i guess the reasoning is that it's too much of a grey area defining when play is pga and when it isnt. in my experience with kdice recently, the only people being punished are the chatbox abusers / forum abusers / username abusers. if you look at advisorLog, xsketch has far more moderation than kdice, as does gpokr. but arent there more kdice players than gpokr and xsketch combined? perhaps there are less kdice cheaters, maybe thats it. anyways, it would be nice to see some new mods (stfu johnson, i dont want to be a mod), who commit more energy to punishing cheating in kdice, not just racism/language/forum idiocy. i really appreciate the current mods, i.e. skrum, who gives us pro bono all these intriguing statistical analyses. grunvagr has all but disappeared. so now it seems Ryan is the only one holding down the fort in kdice. and its tough for him to do that when he's got 3 communities continuously bitching at him every time he tries to implement a positive change in his code. (i couldnt believe how many gpokr players were bitching about some phantom ante bug, instead of constructively helping explain why it was happening and how to fix it.) anyways, i feel we need more active mods here in kdice, and i feel they should be given the power to punish clear and admitted pgas. i believe there are some unbiased and fair people in the community who would do a good job. thoughts? trolls? |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 71 - 76 of 76
|
dasfury wrote
at 10:00 PM, Friday February 19, 2010 EST Yodel, i think this thread predates them being mods.
|
|
-†- wrote
at 10:32 PM, Friday February 19, 2010 EST it does
|
|
TheBetterYodel wrote
at 10:59 PM, Friday February 19, 2010 EST oops :P
|
|
Bleached wrote
at 4:49 PM, Saturday February 26, 2011 EST bump?
|
|
mo chara wrote
at 6:51 PM, Saturday February 26, 2011 EST you cannot compare gpokr and xsketch with kdice there comepletely different xsketch you working with players to get points...you draw good they guess right you both get points..and gpokr is just cards..its all luck you dont have a ****head ****ing up your game or not respecting your flag or pgaing(or on the bigger tables silent truce as they like to call it) there is a different atmosphere playing gpokr and xsketch its more relaxed and players are more respectful..on here its a total different crowd of players..kdice has the most cheaters and ****heads then gpokr and xsketch put together..
|
|
K8Dice wrote
at 5:07 PM, Sunday February 27, 2011 EST I agree with mo chara. The couple months I played gpokr were so relaxed and fun. here it's cutthoat and intense. I like both, but the mods do have different rolls for sure.
|