Forum


does kdice need more punishment from mods?
the full monte wrote
at 2:49 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
this is a serious discussion.

i check out kdice.com/advisorLog about once a week, and have been pleased to see how active the xsketch mod Lei is in punishing cheating over in xsketch land. fairly frequently you will see an entire page of advisorLog filled with him catching people who write answers, who share answers over instant messaging, or people who abuse the chatbox or username choice. and he bans the annoying username people several times in a row as soon as they create new alts. i applaud this effort. i havent been to xsketch recently, but im sure Lei's vigor has a positive influence on the community.

i played a few days of gpokr this month, and was pleased to see that the community there also realizes the punishment of cheating. when i used to play a long time ago, it was commonplace to transfer winnings between alt accounts. apparently that has now been deemed a punishable offense (makes sense), and people only transfer winnings as discretely as possible because they know they will lose all of the winnings if a mod catches them doing it.

what im concerned with in kdice is that the mods dont (or arent allowed to) punish pga. i guess the reasoning is that it's too much of a grey area defining when play is pga and when it isnt. in my experience with kdice recently, the only people being punished are the chatbox abusers / forum abusers / username abusers. if you look at advisorLog, xsketch has far more moderation than kdice, as does gpokr. but arent there more kdice players than gpokr and xsketch combined? perhaps there are less kdice cheaters, maybe thats it.

anyways, it would be nice to see some new mods (stfu johnson, i dont want to be a mod), who commit more energy to punishing cheating in kdice, not just racism/language/forum idiocy. i really appreciate the current mods, i.e. skrum, who gives us pro bono all these intriguing statistical analyses. grunvagr has all but disappeared. so now it seems Ryan is the only one holding down the fort in kdice. and its tough for him to do that when he's got 3 communities continuously bitching at him every time he tries to implement a positive change in his code. (i couldnt believe how many gpokr players were bitching about some phantom ante bug, instead of constructively helping explain why it was happening and how to fix it.)

anyways, i feel we need more active mods here in kdice, and i feel they should be given the power to punish clear and admitted pgas. i believe there are some unbiased and fair people in the community who would do a good job.

thoughts?
trolls?

Replies 1 - 10 of 76 Next › Last »
fiero600 wrote
at 2:58 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
stfu you're worse than leek
Dick wrote
at 3:12 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
You heard it here Monte wants to BRING BACK FIERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dick wrote
at 3:13 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
"this is a serious discussion."
wishbone wrote
at 3:16 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
ok i'll troll you!

(stfu johnson, i DO want to be a mod)* /FIXED

there's a log to check bans on this forum, but no search feature??
fcuku wrote
at 3:19 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
more comparisons to xsketch here, theres a warn button, i got a feeling that wouldnt work due to abuse... but maybe there could be some sort of equivalent, maybe just a way to report a pga instead of continuous forum spam? that way there wouldnt have to be constant modding, but once the pga is reported, the mod could be free to check up on it whenever it was convenient?

i dunno, just vomiting up ideas here
mr Kreuzfeld wrote
at 3:52 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
i think that if you plic mods, you would need to set up areas,

like, if I was to be a mod, i would only be modng 0 and 100 tables, seeing as i have no previous relationships with any f the players there. i would never say yes to mod 2K + tables.

and this is kind of a problem, since you need mods that understand the diplomacy dynamic on the 2K+ tables to be able to see the difference between a PGA and a silent truce. BUT anyone that are familiar with that would no be eligable bc, those would already be playing there.

so on the higher tables the mods should have their own forum and vote, say need 67% to pass a verdict
Vermont wrote
at 6:48 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
It is interesting that we had an attempt at a serious discussion about mods and the first post is from the worst (ex) mod comparing the poster to the the most vocal cheater on the site.
fiero600 wrote
at 8:13 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
ironically you were around for 0 of the months that i was a mod
Vermont wrote
at 9:07 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
I'm pretty sure my lack of game play for one month doesn't have any implication on the thread's initial argument or your former position as (or abuse as) a moderator.

How about a cogent reply to the original posting? As a former mod, you probably have some actual insight here and many people do respect your opinion.
kdicefreak wrote
at 10:17 PM, Thursday December 4, 2008 EST
the answer is yes...especially to the PGAers
KDice - Multiplayer Dice War
KDice is a multiplayer strategy online game played in monthly competitions. It's like Risk. The goal is to win every territory on the map.
CREATED BY RYAN © 2006 - 2025
GAMES
G GPokr
Texas Holdem Poker
K KDice
Online Strategy
X XSketch
Online Pictionary