Those angry bad reviews are from people who I reasonably didn't accept there flag. No one listen to them please, I believe I'm one the most fair players on kdice. If you had 3 territories and flagged me to fight someone with 15 territories FORGET IT I'll attack you. If you kept cutting me and then flagged me FORGET IT I'll attack you. If you were a very early flagger to me or someone else FORGET IT I'll attack you. Otherwise I accept flags

attack after flagged to him. be carefull. STUPID ASSHOLE!!!!!

ATTACKED ME AFTER I FLAGGED HIM WHEN I WAS FIGHTING FOR 3RD BECAUSE HE WANTED TO FINISH THE GAME. VERY UNFAIR PLAYER.

this guy is ur classical idiot; thinks he knows everything bout everyone

This guy is a terrible player, very bad manners, writes angry reviews when he gets stomped.

this guy is retarded, kill on sight, irl if possibile

Dear classical, thank you for reading the post and writing... You understood quite right that flagging is mostly a way to end the game faster, not a magical defense etc. But it has also developed into a powerful strategic tool and way (besides other chat activities) to best ensure that you will get what place you feel you deserve or whatever seems possible. Many old school players still accustomed to the previous version of the game, that used a different flagging system, seem not to be exceedingly happy about this btw. In our case, and also generelly spoken, when there were 3 players left, it is not uncommon for the weakest party to make the suggestion to sit and wait, let the others fight 1 / 3 and get a 2nd place as reward for not taking sides. Certainly another way would be the two stronger players agreeing to ridden of the weaker b4 they fight (you probably have seen that 1 / 2 truce thing). Or, rather unlikely but also seen, one of them says he would fight for 2nd place. That would have been your favourized option as I see it now. In case not any of these solutions is found, it would most likely turn out to be a 2 v 1 play which is even more frustrating, esp. for the strongest player if he gets 3rd by that. By doing this agreement, the weakest player may get a position he didn't deserve, because both larger than him would try to avoid to get 2 v1 ed and moreover not wanting to fight for 2nd place...... So I believe it`s not a mistake to accept such flag in return of th eoption to fight for first place at the risk of getting 3rd. I can wel understand that losing wil get anyone frustrated [happens to me as well], and f course I am also looking forward to play with you again.

we both had 9 territories and were on the opposite ends of a 100table. classicalguss here refused to roll w me for 3rd place...unfortunately the #1 was from hungary and didnt enforce the roll or actually he didnt talk at all. that made us all wait till round 33, classicalguss only started to talk about rolling when i had him down to a 1/4 ratio of territory. never realflagged either, apparently hasnt grasped the concept that he can always reflag down (to 3) from a given flag (2).

Biggest pussy flagger, and acts like a child. He attacks you if you "insulted" his tactics. no sportsmanshop watsoever i recommend you leave the game if hes present. He just screws it over when he got the chance :).