Level 66
0◆
to level 67 |
WilpUckhey Bivo, fuck you
Add a review about this player
Adding a new review will overwrite your old one. Any player can add a review. Sore loser.
Juhokki on Monday September 18, 2017 Seems alright and reasonable enough.
DonnieScribbles on Tuesday May 3, 2016 PLS BAN THIS IDIOT PGA WITH POPETRISCH, TOTAL FAGGOT
BillBlaster II on Friday July 25, 2014 my first tourney win, thx for the fight :D
Nehalenia on Tuesday December 11, 2012 trucer.
Lorenz Roersch on Friday December 7, 2012 BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST BACKSTABBER DO NOT TRUST
architectremix on Friday November 9, 2012 not a honorable player!
lordA on Saturday September 8, 2012 +1
paradigma on Tuesday May 22, 2012 stupid player.
202020 on Thursday March 8, 2012 2012-03-05 WilpUck HATES the review I left him because it includes his own words. Too bad. He reviewed me: "there is something wrong with you : how can you spend too much time to write reviews, most of all when there is nothing particulary to tell? you must be really frustrated and potentially dangerous in real life..." Potentially dangerous? Do you believe HE believes that, Dear Readers, or is WilpUck just trying to be 'clever' (at least by his low standard of clever)? In real life, bullies, con men, and other criminals who exploit others (especially the weak and innocent) may believe me to be dangerous. Surely WilpUck doesn't fall into one of those errant categories, does he? Those who pursue wisdom, justice, and honor feel I am the opposite of dangerous. As to any charge of my wasting time, I'll pay heed to WilpUck's thoughts on the matter when he quits wasting time playing Kdice. ++++++++++ ++++++++++ 2012-03-02 WilpUck is a Level 55 who is so used to unspoken truces on the higher tables that he can't believe it when his unspoken truce is "broken" by yellow on the 0 table (yes, zero table) where we were playing. WilpUck is red, I am purple. Chat below is verbatim as always. ++++++++++ WilpUck: wow ---------- WilpUck: yell, id i attacked u ?? ########## [Note: WilpUck was so SURE they had an unspoken truce; he can't believe yellow attacked him.] ---------- TriG8: no, but if I didn't you were looking good. ---------- TriG8: just a 0 table after all. ---------- 3.14159: red, we play for one of three things in any particular game... ---------- 3.14159: (1) 1st place ---------- 3.14159: (2) some other rank ---------- 3.14159: (3) revenge ---------- 3.14159: that is all ---------- TriG8: you're wrong purple. ---------- TriG8: most people play for points. ---------- WilpUck: oh, u want to learn me the game purp? ty [Note: Poor passive aggresive WilpUck.] ---------- TriG8: unfortunately. ---------- 3.14159: yellow, that is covered by points (1) and (2) ---------- 3.14159: yw, red ---------- 3.14159: i would have thought that at Level 55 you would stop whining when someone attacked you, but... ---------- 3.14159: you are so used to unspoken truces that you could not believe... ---------- 3.14159: that yellow would attack you ---------- TriG8: like I said... it's a 0 table. ---------- WilpUck: right ---------- TriG8: if we were playing at the 500's I'd have played differently. ---------- 3.14159: a 0 table that you high level guys try to play as if it were a 500 table ---------- 3.14159: spoken and unspoken truces that you guys live by ---------- WilpUck: i understand yell, on a 0 table, u play like a beginner so ? ########## [Note: WilpUck's reveals himself again, Dear Readers. "Play like a beginner" he sulks.] ---------- 3.14159: whine some more, red ---------- 3.14159: it is becoming ---------- TriG8: red, wouldn't you agree it's a risk reward proposition.. 0 table so little risk. ---------- WilpUck: hm ---------- 3.14159: no, to red the unspoken truces are THE thing ---------- 3.14159: he cannot believe that you didn't keep to the unspoken truce ---------- 3.14159: he can NOT believe it ---------- TriG8: I didn't see it that way. ---------- 3.14159: i know--red did ---------- TriG8: I simply felt that if I didn't attack him I was playing for scraps. ---------- 3.14159: that is why he reacted the way he did ---------- 3.14159: yellow, i am explaining red not you ---------- WilpUck: u explain me how im playing, ur really helpfull there ########## [Note: Poor, poor WilpUck.] ---------- 3.14159: red thought he had an unspoken truce with you and got upset when he found out you did not ---------- 3.14159: whine some more, red -- i love it ---------- 3.14159: passive aggressive third-grader? ---------- 3.14159: sulk much, red? ---------- 3.14159: grow up ---------- TriG8: I was just trying to explain why I did what I did. that's all. ---------- 3.14159: and do NOT bring your unspoken truces to the 0 tables ---------- TriG8: wasn't trying to get into the politics of kdice. ---------- WilpUck: hey purp, just shut up, u re not so interesting there... ---------- 3.14159: especially do not WHINE about your broken unspoken truces red--pathetic ---------- TriG8: I see the flag brown. ---------- WilpUck: and dont whine, i just ask yellow why he did that ---------- TriG8: no worries red. ---------- 3.14159: "i just ask yellow why he did that"--sure you did, red, sure you did ---------- 3.14159: you will see the verbatim chat in your review--decide then ---------- TriG8: as I was trying to say. on a 0 table I thought it was worth it to try for the win, even if it meant I got last. ---------- TriG8: that's all. ---------- 3.14159: red is the problem, not you red ---------- TriG8: red, you flag right? ---------- WilpUck: obv ---------- TriG8: thanks. ---------- 3.14159: whining about a broken unspoken truce that he should not have expected anyway--on a 0 table ---------- 3.14159: gg ---------- lrap: gg
3.14159 on Monday March 5, 2012 |