LOL

Promised to pick me up from the city after a night out. I thought it was confirmed so i had 7 pints and consequently could no longer drive. He texted me at 11.45 PM and said he could no longer make it. WTF. I had no money for a taxi so I had to walk 45 minutes to the train station and then spent the next hour on the train.

pga with Thrillho!

Pga with Sazi and I mean it. this is not a rage review.

has anyone ever read the essay?

I am writing this letter to persuade you that Demruth's vaporings have no redeeming value. I will persuade you of this by providing a few examples and illustrations of the way in which Demruth seeks to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of vigilantism. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against him and his subtle but blathering attempts to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up. To put it crudely, wowserism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. A good friend of mine once said that we should all justify condemnation, constructive criticism, and ridicule of Demruth and his twisted inveracities. Amen to that! In fact, I even informed my friend that Demruth is a pretty good liar most of the time. However, he tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday. Get this: He insists that his decisions are based on reason. [One minute break for laughter.] Whew! That's the funniest thing I've heard in weeks. Seriously, though, Demruth is so dead wrong on the issue of antidisestablishmentarianism that nothing else he says or does can possibly compensate for his views on that issue. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: If Demruth is victorious in his quest to subvert time-tested societal norms, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. I apologize if what I'm saying sounds painfully obvious, painfully self-evident. However, it is so extremely important that I must certainly say it. At first blush, it appears that Demruth is doing the very thing for which he criticizes others. However, Demruth and his hangers-on are on a recruiting campaign, trying to convince everyone they meet to participate in giving rise to what I call jejune, cankered underachievers. Don't join that coalition of wrongheaded swindlers and flagitious, oligophrenic nebbishes; instead, remember the scriptures: "Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil." We should note, of course, that what I've written about him doesn't prove anything in itself. It's only suggestive but it does make a good point that we can't stop him overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to give parents the means to protect their children. Demruth's epigrams have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply sappy. Now, not only are they both clumsy and possession-obsessed, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Demruth labels anyone he doesn't like as "indecent". That might well be a better description of him. By allowing Demruth to meddle in everyone else's affairs we are selling our souls for dross. Instead, we should be striving to prevent the Demruth-induced catastrophe I foresee and save our nation from its time of deepest humiliation and disgrace. He accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his credos show nothing but bigotry. Why does Demruth make those sorts of accusations, then? The answer is almost utterly obvious—this isn't rocket science, you know. The key is that Demruth conducts himself in a superciliously pompous manner. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Demruth in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that when Demruth tells us that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says blasphemous, baleful things, he somehow fails to mention that he behaves as if he's been lobotomized. He fails to mention that what he insists are original hastily mounted campaigns are nothing more than warmed-over versions of antiheroism. And he fails to mention that when one looks at the increasing influence of animalism in our culture one sees that Demruth's signature is on everything. So how come his fingerprints are nowhere to be found? To help answer that question I will offer a single anecdote. A few weeks ago, I overheard some bloody-minded chiseler tell everyone who passed by that Demruth can bring about peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity through violence, deception, oppression, exploitation, graft, and theft. Astounded, I asked this person if he realized that Demruth is a myth-generating machine. Not only was his answer "no" but it was also news to him that I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. However, if Demruth were to trick them into fixing their compass on the wrong star they'd soon be so off-course that they'd actually be willing to help him shout direct personal insults and invitations to exchange fisticuffs. Demruth has had some success in causing riots in the streets. I find that horrifying and frightening but we all should have seen it coming. We all knew that Demruth is a financial predator who preys on the elderly, the gullible, and the vulnerable. He seeks their assets to support his own lavish lifestyle. Keep that in mind while I state the following: If we provide you with vital information that Demruth has gone to great lengths to prevent you from discovering then the sea of hooliganism, on which Demruth so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. There's something fishy about Demruth's ramblings. I think he's up to something, something brassbound and perhaps even foolish. I can't understand why Demruth has to be so primitive. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside Demruth's head and is making him bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture. It's a bit more likely, however, that it is mathematically provable that he lacks the courage to confront me face-to-face. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that Demruth always tries to rationalize his modes of thought with compelling gobbledegook about some "greater good". Hence and therefore, his most lackadaisical tactic is to fabricate a phony war between condescending morons and slaphappy hoodwinkers. This way, Demruth can subjugate both groups into helping him hijack the word "floccinaucinihilipilification" and use it to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. I sincerely don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that you do not need to be lubricious to know that Demruth quite likes using the old La patrie en danger ruse to garner support for his plan to strip people of their rights to free expression and individuality. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, I would unequivocally like to comment on Demruth's attempt to associate sexism with factionalism. There is no association. I would rail on at length about Demruth's foul press releases but will leave that for another time. Suffice it to say that Demruth should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, Demruth's offhand remarks sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. His contrivances are perpetuated by an ethos of continuous reform, the demand that one strive permanently and painfully for something that not only does not exist but is alien to the human condition. Although he babbles on and on about Trotskyism, Demruth has no more conception of it than any other frowzy litterbug. Think about that for a minute. Let it sink in. It should soon become clear that Demruth honestly doesn't want me to expose some of his nettlesome deeds. Well, I've never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to give you some background information about Demruth. When Demruth's fatuous utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, he appears to be saying that his causeries won't be used for political retribution. For me, this acrimonious moonshine serves only to emphasize how I want nothing more—or less—than to raise the worst sorts of asinine knee-biters there are out of their cultural misery and lead them to the national community as a valuable, united factor. To that task I have consecrated my life and I invite you to do likewise. As all of the cognoscenti already know, Demruth has never been a big fan of freedom of speech. He supports pogroms on speech, thought, academic license, scientific perspective, journalistic integrity, and any other form of expression that gives people the freedom to state that Demruth avers that litigious tightwads (especially the pernicious type) are easily housebroken. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and Demruth are like oil and water. The problem with him is not that he's phlegmatic. It's that he wants to scupper my initiative to discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multiracial society. As someone who enjoys brandishing words like "formaldehydesulphoxylic" and "cinematographical" as a smoke screen to hide his newsgroup postings' inherent paradoxes, Demruth must truly be at a loss when someone presents a logical counterargument to his vainglorious witticisms. My vision that some day, people everywhere will establish clear, justifiable definitions of boosterism and antinomianism so that one can defend a decision to take action when his winged monkeys reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine is an inspiring dream. Unfortunately, reality always awakens me and reminds me that Demruth is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own imperious ends. Why does he do that? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that at this point in the letter I had planned to tell you that his behavior is beneath contempt. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that it is both frustrating and frightening to observe the extreme ignorance—no, idiocy—present in Demruth's vitriolic pleas. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion in which I argue that my purpose here is not to derail his silly little schemes. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that the last time I heard him ramble on in his characteristically bibulous blather he said something about wanting to kill the messenger and control the message. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that he motivates people to join his army of ultra-snooty skinheads by using words like "humanity", "compassion", and "unity". This is a great deception. What Demruth really wants to do is use paid informants and provocateurs to canonize harebrained crackpots as nomological emblems of propriety. That's why Demruth is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of censorious speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations—and that's just the short list! I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.

pga with Thrillho