Level 38
0◆
to level 39 |
ephraimAdd a review about this player
Adding a new review will overwrite your old one. Any player can add a review. Fun player and honest.
HollowayisAlive on Saturday January 24, 2009 Allies in the 2nd round with 2nd strongest, players like him make this a stupid game.
ChuckingMySpears on Saturday November 15, 2008 kirikiri on Saturday October 25, 2008 real shitbag that plays by a bizarree set of rules only he understands, do not trust this player
I Pitty The Fool on Friday October 17, 2008 You invited me for 1st, then backstabbed me and made me 2nd... kill on sight! not to be trusted!
Carlisle on Wednesday October 8, 2008 You invited, I acted on your invitation, you stabbed me in the back. I did not say that no one can trust you. I said "I" can't trust you.
It's that simple.
(and I heard the BBQ was a flop.)
Mike_Mike on Saturday May 10, 2008 played with honor and respected flags, also beepa's opinion doesn't hold much water with me, good game!
Dude111 on Friday May 9, 2008 It's true... I can't be trusted. Especially when I say:
ephraim: red ill be cool if you go thru the top ;)
Which I say because I have you completely surrounded early in the game, and want to leave you room to grow without killing each other in the fight. I figure you can go thru two territories in the very top where I have weak stacks, so that you'll no longer be trapped. Hence "thru."
It is important to note that Mike never responded to my offer. And on his next turn he attacks me (but not on the top). I assume he didn't like my offer and wants instead to fight. But I'm not sure. So I only attack BACK the territory he'd just taken from me.
Mike_Mike: dude/
Mike_Mike: didn't you just say
ephraim: yes, and then you attacked me
Mike_Mike: you said take the top
ephraim: so i thought you must not like that idea
ephraim: i said go thru the top
Santeria1234 has left
Mike_Mike: i did not cut
ephraim: i.e. my two highest points
Mike_Mike: w/e
[note that I am teal, mike is blue]
killerdice23: ill help blue ight
Mike_Mike: :)
killerdice23: nvm he too bitg now
ephraim: and you didn't respond so i thought you were just not likingmy idea
Pickett's Charge: i got your back teal
Pickett's Charge: if nobodyelse does
Mike_Mike: w/e
killerdice23 has left
Orlafede has left
ephraim: does w/e mean i should attack you?
[remember i only took BACK the territory he took, and still wanted to be peaceful. Just didn't know if he was going to attack ME! So I ask, unsure.]
Mike_Mike: do what makes you happy
Mike_Mike: you seem to attack no matter
Mike_Mike: hey, i won't attack... BAM!
So I am forced to conquer him.
Now, miscommunication happens. I'm no stranger to that. But following all this I tried very hard to explain all this - my confusion, the musinderstanding, etc. - to mikey. He kept saying "w/e." And then posts that I can't be trusted anyway. Which is why he won't be invited to the barbeque this weekend.
Trust is one thing. Burgers are another.
ephraim on Sunday May 4, 2008 I don't (or can't) trust this guy. says one thing, does another. What a shame!
Mike_Mike on Sunday May 4, 2008 I'd respond to the others... but I have no idea what they're about. That is when I was learning the game still. Except to say, perhaps, that they're likely accurate!
ephraim on Saturday May 3, 2008 |