Forum
Advisor Blog
Reviews
Strategies
Ideas
Have some smaller tables with less players for a quick game. Less points at stake.
|
popcornbc wrote
at 8:53 PM, Saturday December 16, 2006 EST |
0 people think this is a good idea
|
tehmla wrote
at 9:53 PM, Sunday December 3, 2006 EST I'm concerned people will exploit the (likely) inferior AI players for ratings
|
|
Frank Foobar wrote
at 2:10 PM, Monday December 4, 2006 EST Maybe have some tables that are just smaller? You have variable rank tables now, maybe have some 4 or 5 seat tables in addition to the 7s. That might require some ranking changes, though.
|
|
delmore wrote
at 12:40 AM, Tuesday December 5, 2006 EST ive never had a problem getting a game going, even at 4am -- these guys are impatient, seriously... also, check the tables after you sit down, often i see a table with 5/7 a table with 3/7 and a table with 2/7...
|
|
cirocco wrote
at 1:07 AM, Tuesday December 5, 2006 EST some people have trouble differentiating the greens (like my husband) & want to choose their color- if the colors were changed, this would be fine
|
|
joby.d wrote
at 1:49 AM, Wednesday December 6, 2006 EST If you're that desperate then try dice wars instead? ;)
|
|
0blivion wrote
at 2:56 AM, Wednesday December 6, 2006 EST possibility of ratings rout.
|
|
Ryan wrote
at 9:04 PM, Wednesday December 6, 2006 EST its a lot busier now so games start quick, i think this is not needed
|
|
pulp wrote
at 2:27 AM, Friday December 8, 2006 EST you could make different sizes of fields for when you wanna play a long game or a short one.
|
|
otakufaith wrote
at 12:47 PM, Friday December 8, 2006 EST Agreed. Have s/m/l maps and slight changes in players. say 4 minimum through the normal 8
|
|
TriTL wrote
at 3:06 PM, Friday December 8, 2006 EST think there are not enough players online yet.
|
