I'm listening to you, BugThugh, but I have not-so-distant memories of you proceeding to use gay hate speech in the past, so I executed a ban quite quickly. I should have warned you, but your demeanor toward me dictated that you didn't care about my opinions, so I chose to ban. You relish in your bad attitude on this site, so I thought a slap on the wrist was fair.

Well, you are mistaken or lying. And I don't particularly care about your opinion, you are correct. You don't garner respect from so many here because you don't give it in the first place. Yet again...why you are undeserving of being a moderator.

I give respect where respect is due. Those that get to know me understand that.

He asked for evidence, an account of what he said or even just someone to corroborate your claim. As usual, your reply is just a vague flippant statement passed off as fact.

I wasn't there, so that's all I'll say about it. If monte was there then perhaps he should be the one to clarify what took place.

No gay hate speech. Seemed like it was a standard pge situation with lots of bitching back and forth between the two. Nowhere close to bannable behavior imo. If it was bannable, then bdk should be banned as well. When we all realized that bdk silently banned bug, i chided him for the obv massive conflict of interest. And then jurg/int came in and chided him as well for overbanning.

Was surreal, only mod I can compare it to was tcs. At least when fiero abused his power, he did it with a certain level of acknowledgement. tcs and bdk both came off as being above reproach. Leaves a sour taste imo.

I'm def not above reproach, don't make false claims. I'm here to serve the community, so give me feedback other than you being pissed.

That's the problem... People give you feedback, you just ignore it. We had this exact thread a few weeks ago.

You are deliberately painful to talk to. Bug asked for proof or at the very least an explanation of what you believe he said. It's a really specific question to which you gave a really vague answer. If it was ban worthy, just answer him. If you were wrong, just acknowledge it and move on. Nothing is gained by being so obtuse all the time.

I have no clue what happened at all

I don't defend or support any claims here

But hate chat should be first a warning, then -chat.

No clue why the -play and -post was included on a first offense. That's excessive BDK.

Thanks, monte, for speaking up. And dasfury... it was only a short ban because int and jurg got involved. Even after they reminded him of the pre-set guidelines, he still wanted to keep me banned, then keep me -chat. Then he restored my account without the chat anyway. I mean...it was pretty ridiculous.

Thanks, monte, for speaking up. And dasfury... it was only a short ban because int and jurg got involved. Even after they reminded him of the pre-set guidelines, he still wanted to keep me banned, then keep me -chat. Then he restored my account without the chat anyway. I mean...it was pretty ridiculous.