I totally agree that we need the high paid tourneys towards the end of the month. Else correcting the leaderboard and cheating towards the winner will be much too difficult. High paying tournaments are the most efficient way for that and the site lives from those 10 no-lifes that use 50 accounts to build the leaderboard.

Removing the limit from the other tournaments will not fix this bug! It is thus not a solution (but the way I'd prefer to see).

I like that there are more tourneys now but in my opionion you overdid it a little. Leave some traffic to the regular tables instead of giving everyone easy tourney bonuses.

Way more important though is to give us high stakes tournaments back. Why where they even removed? Give players with a high score some tourneys to play that are worth their time.
That doesn't have to stop at 2k. 5k and 10k would be much appreciated, too. There are high stakes tables, why not have the same for tournaments?

Highering limits seems like a rather problematic and detrimental fix to me. Those low level tourneys also have the purpose of making it easier for players with a low score to get points (so they can play higher tables/tourneys). Hence having limits on them is reasonable.

...so rather have tournaments for every bracket.

bump

imo there should be a winner takes all tournament 5 days away from the end of the month where 24 players with more than 2000 but less than 5000 points throw them all into one showdown for the winner to take them all and gain a second wind in the monthly competition. thatd own

that would be sick

maybe the removal of the bigger tournaments were just a trick to see who would come out and be noticeable, which is some of you who are complaining, all three of you are bad eggs in my head