Forum
Ryan, I think table limits are needed again?
|
integraI wrote
at 10:55 PM, Thursday June 5, 2014 EDT
With all the additions of kill bonuses and more tournies, more people should have more points.
I know it might be tough because there's so few players now but I think institute a point limit for the zeros for sure, of say 500 or 1000? and then a limit on the 100s of say 2000? also unrelated: Thanks a bunch for fixing the pw reset issue, but your unban on my account didn't seem to stick, as I still cannot sit, chat, post in forums, or change avatar... it says You are restricted from playing Your ability to chat has been removed |
|
integral wrote
at 11:55 PM, Thursday June 5, 2014 EDT working!
Thanks again Ryan! |
|
Buttwank wrote
at 8:35 AM, Friday June 6, 2014 EDT Point limits aren't working.
|
|
|
integral wrote
at 3:14 PM, Friday June 6, 2014 EDT my account, that's working.
|
|
Im Defeated wrote
at 12:55 PM, Sunday June 8, 2014 EDT Yea it completely ruins the point of having different level tables not having people forced to compete on the higher level tables once they've made a certain amount of points. I honestly think that if a player has 100 points or more, they must play on a 100 level table or, if they have 500 points or more they must play on a 500 level table or higher. I believe this will make the fight to be on the leader board much more interesting..
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 2:05 PM, Sunday June 8, 2014 EDT it's not that black and white imo
yes, players need to be "gently pushed" towards playing higher tables no, you can't force players to stop playing for fun on the lower tables If they like less risk and don't like all the fuss and drama of the higher tables, they should be allowed to do their thing too. The forum is full of very vocal, more experienced players, "needing" as much fresh blood on the higher tables as possible to gain the easy points from. The casual players will hardly ever respond here but I think it's worth defending their rights too. So what we need is enough incentive to play the higher tables (higher kill bonus accomplished that) combined with realistic table limits (not too strict because people will get discouraged about losing their points from lower tables each time they are forced to play higher tables). |
|
wishbone wrote
at 2:09 PM, Sunday June 8, 2014 EDT weird this problem would be solved with ELO
|
|
Rileyhemp wrote
at 1:20 AM, Monday June 9, 2014 EDT I usually avoid 2k and 5k because it's just not fun for me. There's so much on the line that it's just not a fun environment.
|
|
Giana wrote
at 10:46 AM, Monday June 9, 2014 EDT Same here. If you dont know the players you get fucked, if you get to know them they expect you to 3way truce while the noobs battle each other. Both is too boring for me.
|
|
|
integral wrote
at 11:40 AM, Monday June 9, 2014 EDT The whole point of having more people on 2k/5k is that it will grow the amount of players on these tables, so there'd be less of the elitism and otf.
It's not to gain easy points off noobs... I think my point limit suggestions are fairly reasonable, maybe make them a bit higher? |
|
stakaboo wrote
at 1:47 PM, Monday June 9, 2014 EDT Facts are if you need to wait 15 min to play a 2k or a 5k, I'll stop playing for sure. I understand your system, but it just won't work because most of the time there not enough people in all the website who has 2k or 5k. Well, I'm playing for the love of the game, not for points. I appreciate to play fast without waiting that much.
|