Sup Alan

1) I think Slinus was only getting back on topic (which I don't) by posting the best review he ever got. That's quite hard to do as no metric was defined in the first place, but, no matter which metric you take, considering that review as the best is quite a sad result.

2) Of course people are the same brainless farts in real life they behave here. This is "just a game" so you can reveal your true character without fearing any social or real consequences - you just create another account. From a social studies point this game might be quite fascinating. I sometimes think this is nothing else but a social science or religion class project to make experiments on how a society reacts on external modifications (read scoring system) and when the creator (or god) left and leaves them alone with only 3 but 10 commandments. Which abilities proof valuable and what is mandatory to keep the society from killing itself? Do you need a prophet (let's call him Jurgen) now and then or could you do without???

3) Returning to the topic, I think one of the best recent reviews I got (in terms of imho characterising me right and giving me a good time) is this one:

"honest and fair player Plays smart"

A review more showing the qualities of the reviewer would be this one: "PGA with 'Louis Cypher' and doesnt respect flags!". I'd be screwed if I didn't team up with myself, wouldn't I?

wrong thread bro

confirmed - going to repost.