Forum


So is this is how it really works?
woodcubed wrote
at 5:17 AM, Sunday February 27, 2011 EST
I just read the post by Fiero600. Suffice it to say I find it most revealing. Not the part about people abusing moderator status... not the pga crap at higher level tables... not any of that. I knew all of that. Now, for me, I am a casual player, I have never placed, I have my share of people who say they hate me but probably don't remember me. Really I am just mediocre at this game I figured. Yes, I have had a kdice account, the same and only account since I first signed up for this game in its first year, and I have maybe once gotten to the 5,000 tables Honestly i only try to get points so I can escape the zero tables and for really no other reason. So what is this post about? I will tell you.

Fiero600 says in his goodbye post that the luck for an individual player is affected by whether you have an account. If this is true, I need to think long and hard about whether I should even bother playing. This whole post is a response to this idea, and if it is not true that luck is a manipulated figure, please disabuse me of the notion. I don't spend any time usually in this forum so I would not know if this had come up before.
You see I had thought luck was simply an accounting of how you did, not a variable in the equation itself. Do you know how much stress it causes me, and to other players I am sure, to lose and lose and lose even when I darn well better know the strategy by now? How I will lose, on my first turn, every single attack, even 5v2, and be killed off instantly before the game has even begun? And this is not to say that can''t happen, but seriously. I always figured there was some random number generator somewhere combined with my own mistakes but if there is a thumb on the scale then is there is no point to any of my effort is there? And do I even want to pay to get an advantage over other players that would amount to cheating? In most games with paid perks, you get some magic armor, or a points boost, or another helping hand. But if it is true that paid subscribers get BETTER LUCK or heck even just a privileged few, than what you are telling me is more equivalent to paying not for a stat boost but instead to paying someone to give your opponents a handicap. I play this game because i figured it was a game of strategy mixed with luck and a way to procrastinate occasionally. But apparently it is a game of fixed statistics and politics.

I don't care what goes on at the top of the leader boards. I don't care how rampant the cheating is up in the clouds, and I don't give a crap about point boosts for people who pay for them (because they paid so they should get what is advertised). The only thing i care about, or rather, the only thing i get worked up about, is a basic fairness that comes from true random probability. And if there isn't that one thing, that one most essential component to a game about and centered on the rolling of DICE, then there is no point to any of this, you have causing me small bursts of massive stress for the last 5 YEARS, and I think that anyone who would implement such a system of punishment is a lousy sadist, and ought to be ashamed as a maker of games. If this is true. And please, tell me I am wrong, if i am, because part of me right now sitting here, writing this wants this not to be true, does not wish to believe that i have spent 5 YEARS as the pawn of a sadistic PLOT to provide entertainment for, as fiero600 again so kindly reveals, a "cabal" of special people.

This is not about me though, this is about ALL of the people who come to this site and play a game or two for free in their downtime, or have been doing so with some frequency and wonder occasionally how they could lose so badly, or so quickly, or why the same people always seem to breeze through games unscathed. The very people Fiero mentions, whom I have played with many times having been here as long as I have.

So I guess we are nearing the end of my rant. I don't tend to write long whiny rants, but I just want to know, Ryan, or moderators, or whomever is in charge: Are you punishing me? Are you causing me suffering? Are you cheating us at a fundamental level? This has always been a timewaster for me (in an ok way) but are you wasting my time? I just want to be honestly unlucky- or nothing at all.

« First ‹ Previous Replies 191 - 200 of 205 Next › Last »
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 5:07 PM, Wednesday March 2, 2011 EST
Skrum, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution, can and has been used to cover everything you state as being a power solely of the state. You can argue that that wasn't the intent but it is a little late since that was written 220+ years ago. So while many specific things are not "enumerated" in the Constitution a clause allows for them to be covered by an enumerated power of the Federal Government.

BAM STRICT INTERPRETATION DESTROYED! J/K ;-)
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 8:08 PM, Wednesday March 2, 2011 EST
skrumgaer wrote
at 2:14 AM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
Boner and Sam:

The Constitution does not have stuff about what we put in our bodies (except the 18 Amendment, which was later repealed) because what we put in our bodies was (and still is) a state issue. In some states it is, or was, done by counties or precincts. Also, Indian tribes have some autonomy.

States are not too small to manage their own health care. Health insurance is available to groups much smaller: firms, labor unions, etc.

Admiralty law (the law of ships) has always been under Federal jurisdication and there are health benefits available to sailors (maintenance and cure) that does not have a Federal equivalent in other industries.

Insurance companies, by their very nature, have to be big. Bigness may be appropriate grounds for federal jurisdiction (as in antitrust) but it is the bigness of the company, not the particuar product or service it provides, that is the basic of the federal jurisdiction.

We know that European health care is the ideal model. That is why the Statue of Liberty is in Bremerhaven harbor.
Louis Cypher wrote
at 4:53 AM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
How about like getting back to the subject?

I have never been a member, still I constantly complain about my luck (did the 8v3 thing, did the 8v7-loss series, did the 8v8-no-win series...). Still I'd be very interested to hear but don't have the data to do it myself:

1) Is there accounts averaging as low as reported on their rolls that have not been members?
2) Is there accounts averaging "very high" as well?
3) Is there memberships that have been cancelled without experiencing a drop in luck (that would somehow speak against the cancelling being the only reason for the drop)?
4) How many players use fixed IPs and does luck differ using different accounts on the same IP (I have this fixation of rnd() being initialized with the IP once a day for each IP, so you get the same shit all the time having a fixed one...)

Points per dice can not be tricked by strategy, early flagging and so on, so I think that is an effective measure.


Being in Europe (not close enough to Bremerhafen to see the old lady though) I don't care about baseball too much I must confess...
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 11:12 AM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
Considering the bigness of health insurance companies and the fact that they cross state lines for much of their services, they would fall under federal regulation by the commerce clause since they are commercial entities and if the Federal Government decided that making insurance a part of the Federal Government was the best way to regulate it, then it can under an ENUMERATED POWER of the Constitution.

My issue with your stance isn't as much as if it is the right choice or the best way since you don't seem to be arguing that. My argument is that some of the things you consider outside the responsibility of the Federal Government can in fact be supported by the Constitution as being areas that the Federal Government can regulate or take over.

Now if you want to talk about the economics of and the best way to implement these systems efficiently that is another issue.
skrumgaer wrote
at 2:23 PM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
Sam:

Most insurance regulation is at the state level. Some Republicans have argued that if people were allowed to shop across state lines for their health insurance they could get it more cheaply. But that is a two-edged sword. They could get it more cheaply, but it would come under Federal jurisdication under the Commerce clause!
Boner Oiler wrote
at 3:32 PM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
But the companies themselves operate in more than a single state, which is why the commerce clause applies.
skrumgaer wrote
at 4:19 PM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
Paul v. Virgina, 75 U.S. 168 (1869): insurance is not interstate commerce.

skrumgaer wrote
at 4:21 PM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), insurance is interstate commerce.
jurgen wrote
at 4:29 PM, Thursday March 3, 2011 EST
200 !
KDice - Multiplayer Dice War
KDice is a multiplayer strategy online game played in monthly competitions. It's like Risk. The goal is to win every territory on the map.
CREATED BY RYAN © 2006 - 2025
GAMES
G GPokr
Texas Holdem Poker
K KDice
Online Strategy
X XSketch
Online Pictionary