Forum
Epic November Controversy - Chase = Onix = Boner Oiler ?
|
DoubleDogDareYa wrote
at 5:13 PM, Wednesday December 1, 2010 EST
So wait,
One of chase's accounts is Onix (those are his words from prior conversations) And Onix is one of Veta's accounts. And Veta won with the Boner Oiler account So either chase won November since chase = onix = veta = oiler? <--- maybe or the chase cabal strikes again? <--likely With chase letting veta use the onix account? or???? The month end winner is point funneled (90% of the time) in the last 2-3 evenings (anyway) when the mods are asleep and few are watching. But this month end seems too uneventful. Especially while disrespecting one of the most pro-active mods on the site in the process with a parody screen name. I feel like I'm missing something. The "something epic" that trendz was talking about in the final week has come true. |
|
the full monte wrote
at 3:38 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST dean i have been around for 4 years. you? 6 months. i have led crusades against cheaters that make yours look like a little girl scout bitchfest. youre a moron if you think your conclusions deserve merit.
i have some compassion because im sure you got cheated out of some points where people took advantage of your inability to play the chatbox. and i have compassion because maybe MAYBE you got genuinely cheated against a silent pga. but the way you are presenting your arguments SCREAMS that you are just someone who doesnt understand the complexities of diplomacy, but merely the ability to win at dice wars. that translates into shit at the top tables. learn how to chatbox, and you will succeed. and then others will one day lump you in with the 100% cheating top players too. |
|
DeanVenture wrote
at 3:43 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST I am sure I have had this account just as long.
I refuse to respond to your statements any longer monte. Whatever your game is of trying to "win" an argument, doesn't make you intelligent, or visibly intelligent, or hip or cool. Makes you look desperate to win something without facts. |
|
the full monte wrote
at 3:51 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST thank you dean. i will take that as a victory by forfeit.
and lol if you think you have my experience. no wait, not lol. i didnt even come close to laughing. |
|
superxchloe wrote
at 3:54 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST monte didn't spread any false information... people were looking back at a hilarious event that happened a year ago. ONLX's points were reset. Moderation happened.
Before you start saying things like "I have been playing and have had an account longer than most players who are on this forum" you should either do a little research yourself or tell us the name of your main or previous account. My research show that: you have been playing on this account since June of this year, and you were a mediocre player at best. Your ASR multiplier last month was .99 which puts you in the 13th percentile against the top 100. You didn't sit a 2k until last month. You lost at said 2k (or at a 2k at some point after that) and haven't won a 2k. You've played one 2k table this month and lost at that one too. From what I can see you're a sore loser who assumes that because he can't win everyone else is conspiring against him. |
|
DeanVenture wrote
at 3:59 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST Monte is incorrect in what he said about cheating isn't happening above the 100 boards.
Flat out lie! How can you say he isn't here saying lies? Look it is a cute game you two play if you even know you are playing it with your posts defending each other and attacking others. All I said on this forum about Boner Oiler etc was that he was in fact WRONG. He being wrong doesn't change, keep trying to post, it doesn't change the fact that I responded with his lie with a rebuttal. |
|
the full monte wrote
at 4:02 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST please remind me of how Boner was wrong. i forgot, it was such a long time ago.
for the record, i dont get along with him, and never really have. if he comes clean of his standard scheming, ill have more personal respect for him. im not convinced that this month was clean, and i heard rumors that a point reset might have been petitioned by the mods, but Ryan never responded. oh well. |
|
the full monte wrote
at 4:03 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST and i dont say that cheating doesnt happen. i say that it happens in maybe 10% max of the games at top tables (but not in obv ways, and not in provable ways, cheaters have gotten smart). but to say it happens in 100% is lunacy.
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 4:05 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST "Monte is incorrect in what he said about cheating isn't happening above the 100 boards."
At what point did he say that, exactly? |
|
fiero600 wrote
at 4:38 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST he didn't
|
|
fiero600 wrote
at 4:39 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST oh and.
end of page post :) FACE verms |