Forum
Tea Party candidates.
|
moondust wrote
at 9:48 AM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT
Every time I read about them and their policies, I wonder how people can even consider voting for them.
Am I right when I believe that they hate pretty much everything that's not white, male, straight, married, and rich? Also: what's the point of their obsession with God and religion? I don't think that religion should play a role in politics at all. And I think it's dangerous if politicians from the (still) most powerful country base their decisions on an ancient book. Do Tea Party candidates still live in the Dark Ages? But what I really want to know now: Why do so many Americans actually want to vote for those hateful people? Apart from the fact that I would (most likely) always vote for a democratic candidate, it would be still better to vote for a more moderate repuclican than for a Tea Party candidate. Comments from Americans (Thrax included ;-)) would be appreciated. |
|
Homer Simmpson wrote
at 5:29 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT BTW those of you with children, Isn't it great when they figure out the anatomical difference between boys and girls?
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 5:32 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT My 3-1/2 year old isn't there yet......I'll let you know in a couple years.
|
|
Homer Simmpson wrote
at 5:33 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT Yeah it finally dawned on me when i was in the grocery store with my mom, i think i was like 5.
|
|
nunes wrote
at 5:38 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT That's what I have to say as my final remark on this thread: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZaisF3iLKg
|
|
K8Dice wrote
at 5:41 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT It's interesting to see where the older generations stand with the Tea Party. Though my generation will have to take on most of this debt lolz.
Coming from a traditionally "liberal" state, even here most of what I hear is bickering about Obama because he didn't save them and change everything. Bottom line, the power should always be to the people not to a socialist government. A democracy is not set up for the government to save us, so though I disagree with a lot of what the Tea Party stands for we need to hear what they say. The overall mentality that we have of the quick fix is what got us here in the first place. We need to go back to the theory of the hard work of OUR people to change things not just electing the next different person to see if they can fix it. Hmmm...I did not intend on bantering. Oh well. Also Axxy your remark about marriage I found mildly amuzing. |
|
Thraxle wrote
at 5:47 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT nunes........The Onion is a satirical organization........sorry if I missed your sarcasm
Funny nonetheless! |
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 6:08 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT DiceCube:
Whether a state should deny a marriage license to a couple one of whom has AIDS and the other doesn't is a matter of health, safety, and morals which is usually regulated at the state level, and can vary from state to state. Insurance companies operate in a different way than states. They require a large pool of insured people and set their rates and pay claims according to the laws of statistics. They face an asymmetric information problem: the insured know more about their individual health than the insurance company does. But at the statistical level, the insurance company knows on average the characteristics of a particular population. A change in the law will change the characteristics of a particular population and if the change is big enough the companies may drop coverage (as for the child only policies). The insurance companies seemed not to have dropped family coverage because some familes are black; it remains to be seen whether family coverage will continue if some families are same-sex marriages. |
|
jilm2 wrote
at 6:11 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT "Moondust, I would have to say that you are incredibly naive to think that religion would not play a role in politics. It always has and will continue to do so, regardless of religion, party and geographic location."
Well it generally does not in Europe unless you define "religion" and "playing a role" in some very post-modern fashion. Particularly in my country no formal religion impacts voters' behaviour whatsoever. I also find it hilarious when Thraxle says he's an atheist and in the next sentence that we were not made to be gays. You're not an atheist if you believe in some metaphysical purpose in which sake we've been made. I'd call you a pagan. :-) |
|
fcuku_ wrote
at 6:16 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT i love threads like these
|
|
fcuku_ wrote
at 6:17 PM, Tuesday October 26, 2010 EDT The tea party is fascinating. I mean how many times has there ever been a conservative counterculture?
|