he just said that it is not at all irrefutable.

which means it's refutable.

sorry I win.

I posted what i saw

Would have been pretty easy to get a screen grab, copy pasta isn't real evidence.

Troy11's turn
Troy88 defeated 8v1, 32 to 5, (6,5,2,3,6,4,1,5 to 5)
Troy88 defended 1v7, 0 to 26, (0 to 4,5,2,3,6,2,4)
Troy88 defeated 7v7, 21 to 17, (1,6,4,2,4,2,2 to 6,4,2,1,2,1,1)
Troy88 defended 1v6, 0 to 25, (0 to 2,6,4,6,3,4)
Troy88 defeated 6v4, 23 to 17, (6,1,5,2,4,5 to 5,5,5,2)
integraI defended 1v5, 0 to 21, (0 to 5,6,4,2,4)
Troy88 defeated 5v2, 13 to 5, (1,6,2,1,3 to 3,2)
Troy88 defended 4v4, 12 to 15, (5,1,5,1 to 4,3,4,4)


...so not only were you a shared account, not only were you proxying with yourself, but you also copy/pasted these events, and edited out your names and put in integrai's. thats like instapermabanhammer.

(yes i agree with you that int's acct is prolly shared and your ctrl-v shows that, but if you want to nail someone, you must have screenshots. or at least an AIM convo in which zoid says he had the log in to ONIX.)

FOILd

also lol at the 11/88 mix.

Sam:

Having spaghetti tonight? Your Freudian slip would suggest so...

Sorry the internet lingo was over your head old man, not that I talk in internet speak but it isn't that hard to think that was an intentional joke.

That went over my head too. Must be a mod blind spot.

who made this important?

(patting myself on the back for noticing the copy pasta term.)

young at heart, old at back.