Forum
1v5, 1v6 LoL
|
Troy88 wrote
at 11:55 PM, Monday February 22, 2010 EST
IntegraI's turn
im not adam defeated 8v1, 32 to 5, (6,5,2,3,6,4,1,5 to 5) integraI defended 1v7, 0 to 26, (0 to 4,5,2,3,6,2,4) camtastic defeated 7v7, 21 to 17, (1,6,4,2,4,2,2 to 6,4,2,1,2,1,1) integraI defended 1v6, 0 to 25, (0 to 2,6,4,6,3,4) camtastic defeated 6v4, 23 to 17, (6,1,5,2,4,5 to 5,5,5,2) integraI defended 1v5, 0 to 21, (0 to 5,6,4,2,4) camtastic defeated 5v2, 13 to 5, (1,6,2,1,3 to 3,2) camtastic defended 4v4, 12 to 15, (5,1,5,1 to 4,3,4,4) |
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 11:58 PM, Monday February 22, 2010 EST So it begins.
Tanked by morning? |
|
the full monte wrote
at 1:24 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST sam you idiot thats Lntegral rolling, not integral. you are a embarrassment to the title of #1 career.
|
|
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 1:56 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST Um I know who is rolling who here, I do not know why you are assumining I am not aware of wtf is going, oh yea.....
couchy: cuz monte is a douche I always forget that. |
|
integraI wrote
at 2:11 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST yeah troy typo'd my name at first, what a fuck.
so the entire thing might be doctored. |
|
Jack Swallows wrote
at 8:40 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST banhammer?
|
|
Troy11 wrote
at 10:11 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST i copied and pasted it, didnt highlight the i, name it capitol, not hard to understand
|
|
|
Jack Swallows wrote
at 10:12 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST irrefutable evidence
|
|
|
Troy11 wrote
at 10:14 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST not at all
|
|
|
integraI wrote
at 10:25 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST so it is refutable?
sweet saved. |
|
Pixel-Dust wrote
at 10:37 AM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST Have to agree with Jack. Since the 1 die rolling is irrefutable evidence of account sharing, shouldn't that account be banned?
|
