its really chase wrote at 8:48 PM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST because 7 was a jew would have worked too

dasfury wrote at 9:43 PM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST i had to go back and read the joke. but yes that works too

fiero600 wrote at 10:55 PM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST Pat. 0- and -0 are different. I didn't say 0-

fiero600 wrote at 11:12 PM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST Hey wait. Can we go back to laughing at yodel for calling binary an entire computer language and saying it's not math?

Pat Whalen wrote at 11:53 PM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST Fiero, thats why i wasn't talking to you, i was talking to chloe/int. Two completely different conversations.

Pat Whalen wrote at 11:56 PM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST chloe: "also the limits definition of negative zero was p legit"

Pat Whalen wrote at 11:56 PM, Tuesday February 23, 2010 EST chloe: "also the limits definition of negative zero was p legit"

Troy11 wrote at 12:44 AM, Wednesday February 24, 2010 EST WtF, how r 0 and p related, 1 is a number, 1 is a letter

fiero600 wrote at 1:30 AM, Wednesday February 24, 2010 EST oh dear god troy you're as dumb as yodel "also the limits definition of negative zero was p legit" p = pretty she's not comparing -0 to the letter p

Pat Whalen wrote at 1:44 AM, Wednesday February 24, 2010 EST u mean 0-