Leek Step wrote at 6:11 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST unfortunately fcuku "they" arent going to release any details because we have no rights ONLX is just another in a long line of top accounts who are punished quite randomly

Gurgi wrote at 6:16 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST seemed like it was kinda random

Sunnyside Up? wrote at 6:53 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST If by random you mean shared, exploited for the original account owner's OTF network, and funneled points..........then yeah, I agree it's random.

fcuku wrote at 7:00 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST well first off it wasnt shared, and the rest of that is exploited by the rest of the leaderboard

trendz wrote at 7:20 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST ^ Errr Wrong.

KDICEMOD wrote at 7:21 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST And of course you have some kind of tangible proof that it wasn't shared.

fcuku wrote at 7:22 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST i dunno, ask the guy who was actually playing it

fcuku wrote at 7:24 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST i just dont want an account that i had no part in meddling with get banned bc he was pretending to be me, and getting all of the benefits that come with that

KDICEMOD wrote at 7:37 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST oh, you mean it was a "scheme"?

fcuku wrote at 7:51 PM, Sunday January 31, 2010 EST the only part of the "scheme" was him pretending to be me, bc it was a CAPS LOCK pokemon acct, which has already been explained by camb's chatlog