Forum
Tikeve leads tight pack in new-datum January TAZD.
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 1:21 PM, Saturday January 9, 2010 EST
The TAZD is explained on my Wall. To qualify, 35 or more non-tourney games for the month are needed.
TAZD Player 8997 tikeve 8658 Piano 8467 Devos- 8031 ji-jo 7896 Josélito Michaud 7892 Troy11 7882 FilipL 7386 T.U.R.K 7245 boazik 7235 tanty 7180 Pat Whalen 7055 riser 6972 Way 6922 strous 6725 FriedhofchillOr 6655 ghost_fb 6593 habit1 6302 OgreShaman 6265 benn> 6004 Yce 5944 Tanyás 5732 Royal Mint 5718 takitani 5563 markobg 5328 Yooo!! 5315 Mitsi the cat 5280 LifeArrow 5276 kokobongo 5194 Az_Balu 5157 davilfs 5135 Myriad 5082 kolaps 5081 fgfx 5067 kostur 5063 Barneck 5029 savif 4980 leliukazzz 4972 Jazcan 4898 L3xy 4891 Mustang 4827 greekboi 4821 happytoscrap 4615 jilm2 4591 Slinus 4543 Iumentum 4522 WILenin 4446 WestCoast 4411 DJohnson 4368 yNewby 4290 Jily 4283 junobeach 3886 Vsync 3724 xkatelynx 3705 RobbStark 3597 WHERE DA GOLD AT 3537 fish28 3488 slope111 3323 Loobee 3258 steinkirsche 3084 potato27 3068 Dauphin 2980 Cees 2775 Toxim 2710 caesar-blue 2710 jokerswild91 2673 peter luftig 2569 Mr. Jakal 2528 C0R0 2427 crystal4444 2162 sertach 2147 yellowfin 1918 fatinbox 1904 emp0rArr 1719 trendz 1653 Robertass 1451 scubastog 1305 Rowdyazell 1252 dr. zoidberg 69 1107 speerman86 |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 16 of 16
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 6:42 AM, Sunday August 22, 2010 EDT ONIX's percentages add to 101. That means they were corrupted early in the month. I did not discover that some of the percentages were corrupted until after I posted the finishing list for the month.
Because of corrupted percentages in January, February, and March, this year's yearly TAZD runs from April. |
|
superxchloe wrote
at 8:25 AM, Sunday August 22, 2010 EDT Yes, skrum, we're all aware of that. Could you please repost the zero datum that is currently being used? I can't find it easily in the forums. or calculate tikeve's january end month tazd?
thanks. |
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 9:31 AM, Sunday August 22, 2010 EDT Here is the zero datum:
07.2 07.9 10.2 14.0 17.5 20.3 22.9 |
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 10:25 PM, Sunday August 22, 2010 EDT tikeve's end month tazd was 7379, unless my math is wrong. This places him near the middle of the pack against the top 100.
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 5:27 AM, Monday August 23, 2010 EDT So it was tiekeve's, not ONIX's, TAZD that you were all interested in. I presume the whole point of this thread is that 35 games is not a sufficient number of games for the TAZD. And you are correct. 35 games is good for the TAPL to avoid having to use Yate's correction. That is equivalent to 5 games in the smallest cell. Since the percentages of firsts in the TAZD is about half of that of the TAPL, and that is the smallest expected number, the number of games for the TAZD should be 70. But I kept it at 35 because for a while I posted the TAPL and TAZD together. Should I go to 70 games for the TAZD as standard policy?
|
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 9:45 AM, Monday August 23, 2010 EDT I believe 35 is a reasonable minimum for both tests.
The point was more that Chase used this month as proof that you can win the tazd with a relatively small number of games. While I believe you can do well in the tazd with a small number of games, this isn't really proof of such. |
