Forum
L constitution
|
llIIllIIll wrote
at 12:03 PM, Thursday August 6, 2009 EDT
I think the L's should at least have some governing rules.
#1- Try not to give away your identity. (Don't ask, don't tell. Feel free to chat w/ other L's, but don't try to get personal) --This also means closing your browser session after logging in/out so people don't see you or your main pop up on their friends list. #2- Don't leave reviews. L's are too classy to whine on someone's wall about unrespected flags & bullshit. #3- Don't PGA/PGE or be a dipshit. The purpose of the L's is anonymity, not to solely help other L's. Any other thoughts? |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 21 - 28 of 28
|
integraI wrote
at 12:22 PM, Friday August 7, 2009 EDT at least it's something to do that doesn't require scheming to pga someone to first.
|
|
|
integraI wrote
at 12:23 PM, Friday August 7, 2009 EDT and i mean it's gonna become pretty obvious who everyone is once they start getting more pts.
|
|
greekboi wrote
at 1:52 PM, Friday August 7, 2009 EDT yo never thought id say this, but les is right
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 1:25 AM, Sunday May 4, 2014 EDT This was a good idea......for about 3 days.
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 5:06 AM, Sunday May 4, 2014 EDT This WAS a good idea...too bad I missed it because I retired back then
The idea behind it was great (no pga/pge/bs and total anonymity) and maybe deserves a revival for a month? Possibly with a contributor badge on the account of the winner's choice for L alt with highest score. |
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 5:12 AM, Sunday May 4, 2014 EDT Yeah, but I had to ban all the L accounts.
|
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 5:13 AM, Sunday May 4, 2014 EDT I'm guessing some didn't play by the rules and used it as a cover?
|
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 6:01 AM, Sunday May 4, 2014 EDT Few did after the novelty wore off, so I ended up banning all I could find since there was no way to tell who was who.
|