Forum
44 days in...
|
Thraxle wrote
at 11:18 AM, Wednesday March 4, 2009 EST
...and there is no sign that Mr. Obama is any different from the past democrats that sat in the oval office. The only exception is that he has 100% compliance within his party and a majority in congress that will pass anything Mr. Obama supports.
How hypocritical is it that Mr. Obama continues to remind the general public of the deficit he inherited, but then spends so recklessly that the possibility of having a balanced budget anytime within his term is utterly impossible. How hypocritical is it that the libs called the recent spending bill that was passed a "stimulus package". How does $20 billion dollars towards food stamps stimulate the economy? What jobs will be created by increasing food stamp allowances? This is only one example of many within that spending bill, but I'll try to avoid making this post unneccisarily long. One of you left wingers need to help me understand what our President is attempting to do. The view from the cheap seats here in right field makes the picture look exactly like I thought it would look before the election took place; the liberal democrats want a socialist republic in place of our cherished capitalistic society. Let's continue to drain the rich to pay for the poor. Let's continue to increase taxes on large corporations that have been laying off employees at an enormous pace. Let's increase benefits to the unemployed instead of finding ways to provide jobs for them. I'm ranting a bit, but one thing is clear. Barack Obama scares the living shit out of me. JP, UGB, anybody, please help me feel better about the job he's doing. And someone explain to me how the fuck he has a 67% approval rating. They must have done the polling at a foreclosure seminar or a foodbank. |
|
Vermont wrote
at 12:06 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST Do you know what happens if you stop feeding the lion? They get sort of cranky.
|
|
Adonia wrote
at 12:47 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST how in the world did you mean the hands over face thing? lol
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 12:51 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST Les is jealous that my thread is 52 deep in just 24 hours. It's OK les, I don't want the #1 spot as attention whore of the forum. You can keep it.
Glad you broke your silence to contribute Verm. You're right, most president's have high numbers at the beginning of their first term, if for no other reason than a change has occured and the outcome has yet to be scrutinized. Storm, I wasn't saying you had been manipulated by a network. I was simplying saying that the data you see depends on which network you watch. CNN or MSNBC won't report information that will have a negative effect on the left. FOX won't report information that will have a negative effect on the right. I love sitting down late at night and flipping back and forth between MSNBC and FOX. It's funny as shit. Everyone at MSNBC is smiling and walking around with huge erections while everyone at FOX is bitching and moaning about how the U.S.A. is about to shrivel up and die. |
|
Cal Ripken wrote
at 12:54 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST You would enjoy watching huge erections.
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 12:55 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST Only if they aired on FOX...
|
|
Turd-Ferguson wrote
at 1:07 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST Check this out Thraxle this explains Why Obama is right and Rush is wrong!:
http://s5.tinypic.com/1iexiu.jpg "itt we post about chicks and gay things (but mostly funny to me)" |
|
thraxleisgay wrote
at 1:10 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST example 2: http://i43.tinypic.com/2afybsg.jpg
|
|
thraxleisgay wrote
at 1:10 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST uhh "itt we post about chicks and gay things (but mostly funny to me)"
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 1:15 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST ...and now les and his endless droves of alts have hijacked the thread.
|
|
thraxleisgay wrote
at 1:20 PM, Thursday March 5, 2009 EST <-- taking the blame for mikey YET AGAIN
|