Attempting to justify Bomb by saying that he only had people covering his account "some of the time" is ridiculous on the face of it.

Wishbone only got "some" of his points by buying them.

:)

0. It is not meg. Read carefully :(.

1. It is not possible to play 1600+ games only in high ranked tables. You cannot pick tables and opponents if you play that many games. That would certainly reduce your average.

2. Was it too hard to play a little more games? It looks like there were NOT ENOUGH SKILLS to beat a player with a different strategy.
Maybe he had not enough patience? Well, that is a skill you need when you don't play with your friends in the same table. Quite useful in the low tables.

Not enough time? Less time bragging about skills and more time playing would have increased his score.

First of all Jer, Wishbone almost doubled his score by buying points. This cannot quite be compared to having someone play a couple turns for you while your busy.

Vote or not, everyone knows who won.

Ya..... ME.... the records just don't show it

<-- Gets his info straight from the source

MeAgain, Bomb has said repeatedly that he doesn't play the 2.5k's or 10k's because he's at work and doesn't want to lose the points if he has to leave mid game (which he claims happens a lot).

Not that I necessarily believe that... ;-)

He's got my vote.

Too gay you would like any guy that can go on for 10 hours non stop ;-)

Depends on his looks Jurgen.

I vote for Bomb! The buying of points at the last minute is beyond "strategic." Is there anyone who in good faith thinks that buying first is a sharp strategy move? Bomb should be first!