i nominate Bomb as moderator

i nominate rnd

who is rnd?

if i were a moderator i would abuse my power to NO end and i can admit that, if you think you can be unbaised you are a fool, fair play and this game DO NOT go hand in hand, no one here is fair, the only reason this game has gotten so far is the freedom to do what ever the hell you want to do without some pussy whipped people running about thinking they know what is ''right'' and what is not. i'm tired with everyone preposing ''change'' when it seems to me like you don't even know what the word means.

But in all seriousness, i vote me... i prepose dictatorship, i plan to have 6 subordinates (of whom all will have the ''chance'' of a top 7 place finish), i will pick who can speak, when they can speak and what they speak about, i pick your avatars, i pick the pga's, i pick the winners and the losers.
Ryans role will effectively be God, no one really knows if he actually does anything or even if he really exists.

I'm for the litte guy, who gets shat on constantly but still puts 100% in, even when he gets 4 way pga'ed and abused.

sunvic sounds like obama.

YES WE CAN.

Mugabe*

but with more palaces and less civil disobedience, i.e. voting

sure, i'd suggest you add the ability to mark players for a stricter level of scrutiny (tighter metrics?) on the co-play ban system - it means there would still have to be evidence, but you could run tighter rules without catching honest players who happen to play together a lot as they wouldn't be "marked"

either way, I'm in. I'd also suggest only limiting it to members for an additional level of security

I nominate jurgen (plan B)

(Hopefully this way he won't have time to make his ridiculous transvestite jokes.)

In all seriousness , I think the moderator should not get points. And Jurgen would be a good choice.

I'm interested, Ryan.