Forum
Third Weekiversary for the April TAPL scores
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 5:30 PM, Saturday April 21, 2007 EDT
Below are the top 25 scorers for April, arranged by TAPL.
For explanation of the TAPL, see my comment posted on my own profile page. For comparison, my profile is on the bottom row. 17 (6.39) kwizatz -23 2010 (138th) 303 19% 11% 10% 10% 9% 14% 23% 3723 6 (12.27) pUPAS 0 2106 (25th) 125 17% 22% 23% 11% 9% 6% 9% 2473 24 (5.39) Tomster 0 2079 (40th) 167 17% 25% 15% 10% 10% 9% 10% 2433 1 (42.39) rnd 0 2188 (2nd) 118 24% 18% 11% 13% 5% 9% 16% 1989 20 (5.82) Vermont 0 2096 (30th) 242 20% 16% 12% 16% 13% 12% 7% 1763 9 (9.58) Lothros 0 2106 (25th) 158 22% 13% 14% 18% 11% 13% 6% 1749 23 (5.53) Yce 23 2120 (21st) 184 14% 21% 15% 14% 15% 10% 7% 1525 7 (10.50) Sinth 0 2190 (1st) 129 21% 20% 11% 12% 8% 9% 15% 1474 10 (9.54) Cleopatra 0 2177 (4th) 182 15% 17% 13% 19% 14% 7% 10% 1313 2 (31.12) X LUCK X -1 2148 (7th) 351 15% 14% 18% 15% 14% 9% 11% 1304 19 (5.91) Stoudemire 0 2134 (9th) 92 14% 23% 11% 18% 9% 15% 6% 1288 5 (14.32) Grunvagr 0 2109 (24th) 231 18% 14% 18% 13% 14% 11% 8% 1287 15 (7.03) schnee henry 0 2026 (111th) 83 25% 10% 14% 10% 18% 8% 12% 1239 4 (15.92) montecarlo -8 1991 (181st) 212 17% 18% 17% 13% 11% 10% 10% 1151 11 (9.06) Wurzlbrunft 23 2127 (13th) 129 20% 16% 16% 13% 6% 13% 11% 1097 13 (7.54) braINsane -19 2079 (40th) 185 20% 12% 14% 13% 16% 8% 14% 1070 22 (5.72) joex -14 2047 (78th) 196 16% 14% 20% 13% 10% 11% 13% 938 25 (5.20) Rsquared -58 1917 (296th) 289 17% 13% 13% 13% 10% 18% 13% 929 3 (20.59) riser 0 2187 (3rd) 92 21% 19% 13% 13% 11% 9% 10% 828 12 (7.61) Kehoe 0 2063 (63rd) 279 16% 15% 15% 12% 10% 13% 17% 717 8 (10.08) integral 0 2095 (31st) 166 19% 17% 13% 10% 13% 12% 13% 676 14 (7.18) Volvic 51 2066 (58th) 285 14% 17% 15% 14% 14% 12% 10% 611 16 (6.89) rabbidmonkey4 0 2113 (23rd) 134 17% 16% 17% 11% 12% 14% 9% 574 18 (6.28) Optical 0 2035 (98th) 171 14% 19% 14% 12% 14% 10% 15% 562 21 (5.73) sumpdiddlyump 0 1921 (290th) 168 16% 13% 13% 12% 13% 14% 17% 240 1363 (0.03) skrumgaer 0 1613 (2761st) 96 8% 8% 21% 20% 14% 15% 10% 1193 |
|
_rnd wrote
at 5:49 PM, Saturday April 21, 2007 EDT doesn't this um .. rank really bad players equally with really good ones?
|
|
Ubersmush wrote
at 6:08 PM, Saturday April 21, 2007 EDT dugg down
|
|
Beastie wrote
at 7:00 PM, Saturday April 21, 2007 EDT Just because I lose alot of games my score goes down. Is there anyway we can fix this? Also can we make more players be nice to me. i am an insecure loser and need this game to make me feel strong.
|
|
Grunvagr wrote
at 10:09 AM, Sunday April 22, 2007 EDT I thought I used to understand more or less how the TAPL worked... but how the hell is kwiz first under that scoring? wasn't it based highly off of win %'s?
19 % 1st 11% 2nd 14% 6th 23% 7th (note, kwiz is a badass player who only has bad stats currently cuz he purposely tanked his score as part of the phoenix project, and went from 1250 to 2150 in a matter of 2 days when he started playing for real again, so i'm not saying anything against his playing) but how in the hell does that work? I thought TAPL was win %s ? |
|
kwizatz wrote
at 12:26 PM, Sunday April 22, 2007 EDT I fully endorse this method of scoring. Ryan, I suggest it be adopted as the official kdice scoring system.
I await the change to take effect so that I may take my rightful place as #1 on the top players page. |
|
|
rnd wrote
at 1:48 PM, Sunday April 22, 2007 EDT DiceLord, care to give us a simplified explanation? ;)
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 2:16 PM, Sunday April 22, 2007 EDT Grun: "I thought TAPL was win %s"
TAPL will measure any kind of skill, whether highball or lowball. It takes skill to come in last place in almost a quarter of your games when the law of averages indicates only 14%. So kwiz can be justly proud of his two kinds of skill, all shown in three weeks! |
|
|
rnd wrote
at 3:17 PM, Sunday April 22, 2007 EDT skrum:
what would the top 25 look like if you negated the effect for 5-7th? |
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 3:25 PM, Sunday April 22, 2007 EDT rnd: without the 5-7th, the TAPL's would be
17 (6.39) kwizatz -23 2010 (138th) 303 19% 11% 10% 10% 9% 14% 23% 1428 6 (12.27) pUPAS 0 2106 (25th) 125 17% 22% 23% 11% 9% 6% 9% 1455 24 (5.39) Tomster 0 2079 (40th) 167 17% 25% 15% 10% 10% 9% 10% 1754 1 (42.39) rnd 0 2188 (2nd) 118 24% 18% 11% 13% 5% 9% 16% 1062 20 (5.82) Vermont 0 2096 (30th) 242 20% 16% 12% 16% 13% 12% 7% 830 9 (9.58) Lothros 0 2106 (25th) 158 22% 13% 14% 18% 11% 13% 6% 914 23 (5.53) Yce 23 2120 (21st) 184 14% 21% 15% 14% 15% 10% 7% 657 7 (10.50) Sinth 0 2190 (1st) 129 21% 20% 11% 12% 8% 9% 15% 903 10 (9.54) Cleopatra 0 2177 (4th) 182 15% 17% 13% 19% 14% 7% 10% 468 2 (31.12) X LUCK X -1 2148 (7th) 351 15% 14% 18% 15% 14% 9% 11% 451 19 (5.91) Stoudemire 0 2134 (9th) 92 14% 23% 11% 18% 9% 15% 6% 697 5 (14.32) Grunvagr 0 2109 (24th) 231 18% 14% 18% 13% 14% 11% 8% 545 15 (7.03) schnee henry 0 2026 (111th) 83 25% 10% 14% 10% 18% 8% 12% 907 4 (15.92) montecarlo -8 1991 (181st) 212 17% 18% 17% 13% 11% 10% 10% 530 11 (9.06) Wurzlbrunft 23 2127 (13th) 129 20% 16% 16% 13% 6% 13% 11% 415 13 (7.54) braINsane -19 2079 (40th) 185 20% 12% 14% 13% 16% 8% 14% 542 22 (5.72) joex -14 2047 (78th) 196 16% 14% 20% 13% 10% 11% 13% 574 25 (5.20) Rsquared -58 1917 (296th) 289 17% 13% 13% 13% 10% 18% 13% 248 3 (20.59) riser 0 2187 (3rd) 92 21% 19% 13% 13% 11% 9% 10% 499 12 (7.61) Kehoe 0 2063 (63rd) 279 16% 15% 15% 12% 10% 13% 17% 199 8 (10.08) integral 0 2095 (31st) 166 19% 17% 13% 10% 13% 12% 13% 605 14 (7.18) Volvic 51 2066 (58th) 285 14% 17% 15% 14% 14% 12% 10% 204 16 (6.89) rabbidmonkey4 0 2113 (23rd) 134 17% 16% 17% 11% 12% 14% 9% 297 18 (6.28) Optical 0 2035 (98th) 171 14% 19% 14% 12% 14% 10% 15% 354 21 (5.73) sumpdiddlyump 0 1921 (290th) 168 16% 13% 13% 12% 13% 14% 17% 120 1363 (0.03) skrumgaer 0 1613 (2761st) 96 8% 8% 21% 20% 14% 15% 10% 1077 |
|
|
rnd wrote
at 3:29 PM, Sunday April 22, 2007 EDT if they were reversed i mean :) counted against the ranking.
|