Not to be trusted. Backstabs after trucing

ASSHOLE

I must be getting a different DDDY then everyone else, because the one I play against sure does get cranky.

Got no qualms with dddy. A good player.

honorable player

Sorry to add to the long posts, but I just saw this and feel I should say something. Yes, dddy is completely correct and Jproducts (who I've never really seen much of and don't have a strong opinion about) has distorted the facts to make his case look good. Long story short: dddy and I started off in a hard spot in the NW side of the board, a soft truce was established with him attacking south and I building up, jproducts offered dddy a truce which made no sense since they were not bordering each other, jp said he wanted 2nd with no affirmative reply from dddy. By this time I was established in the NE and very NW tip, dddy in most of the NW, Jproducts in the middle and another player in the SW. Then for no reason jproducts cuts dddy: this statement bears repeating. *For no reason*, Jproducts cut dddy (especially irrational considering he told dddy he would take 2nd). Of course with dddy and the fourth player (whom jproducts had been attacking) not particularly fond of him at this point, I went for the newly opened buffet. With dddy and Jproducts battling, I was able to devour enough of Jproducts lands to secure a 2nd place flag from dddy and a 1st for myself. Nothing else to mention, just a bitter player (at least in this game) who wanted to rationalize his bad decisions on a fabricated PGA.

So regarding Jproducts comments. He is about 3/4 correct in his story. And aside for his mis-perspective on one game, I respect him. But he twisted the facts to make his point. (as they always do). As the game unfolded, I was not getting attacked much by ny(accept in the beginning of the game) and I was not interested in attacking Ny since there was another guy on my ass earlier. So a "soft truce" was established. As my attacks moved south to battle the guy to my south, Ny saw that I "had a hobby" and was weak. So Ny apparently did the smart thing...he/she built up. So now there are four of us left on the board. Smooch, Jp, NY and me. Smooch is south and adjact to Jp. I'm in the northwest and adjacent(just to the west)to Ny (who is in the northeeast). Jp attempts to make a truce offer. This was not my plan since I never truce those who are not adjacent to me. It never makes tactical sense. So I declined the truce and continued south to hit smooch. Jp said he was cool with 2nd. I said that he could go for whatever he wanted. I was not in controll of the board. So about two turns later, he cuts me. He assumed that everyone would revolt against met since I was in first. Well, he was wrong. I spoke up and my soft truce with Ny became a hard truce. Stated my intentions. (And I would be willing to bet that Ny was drooling at this point since he/she saw that I was screwed.) So as always, the guy who tries to scew me after saying he was ok with 2nd, decides to flag after EVERYONE was on his ass. Now I believe everyone turned on him simply because he lied. I always turn on those who lie. But anyway. Peace" -" -

So...i was in first place, asked ddd for a truce, and he wouldnt accept. Then, I cut him really bad and he was about to lose when all of a sudden, he says we were truced and complains that i broke it, when he was the one who wouldnt acceot my truce request. THEN, out of NOWHERE, nyos, brown started attacking me. I had not attacked him all game, not once, and ddd and nyos had NO DISCUSSION whatsoever the ENTIRE game. DDD claims that he had a "soft truce" with nyos from the start of the game????!!!!?!!!!? start? hmm ismell something fishy. He then said that when i attacked him it became a hard truce between him and brown.......okay. Point is, nyos and ddd are an obvious pga, watch out for them. He then took me out and didnt respect my 2nd place flag. He said i attacked him so thats why he took me out, yet i surrendered 2nd to him....isnt that what flags are for? Watch out for this guy. DO NOT play him if he is sitting with NYOS, because they are in pga, WATCH OUT!" ---------------RESPONSE: NO NO NO WHAT A FUCKING LIAR! HE WAS NOT ATTACHED TO NYOS'S SOUTH NYOS WAS IN NORTHEAST AND HE WAS IN NORTHWEST. I WAS COVERING ALMOST THE WHOLE SOUTH, EXCEPT FOR SMOOCH WHO HAD SOUTHWEST (4 OR 5 TERRITORIES.) I REQUESTED DDD'S TRUCE, AND HE NEVER ACCEPTED, AS HE STATED HERE. I CUT HIM AND HE BLAMED ME FOR BREAKING A TRUCE WE SUPPOSEDLY HAD WHICH HE ADMITS HERE HE NEVER ACCEPTED. THEN, AS HE IS LYING HERE, HE NEVER EVER EVER EVER TALKED TO NYOS ONE ON ONE THE WHOLE GAME ABOUT A TRUCE, IT IS JUST SUPPOSEDLY ESTABLISHED OUT OF THIN AIR WHEN I ATTACKED DDD. HE SPEAKS OF TACTICAL SENSE, YET WHEN I WAS ATTACKING SMOOCH, HE COULD HAVE FOUGHT NYOS, OR IF HE HAD OF TRUCED ME IT WAS GUARANTEED SECOND FOR HIM, NO QUESTION. NYOS ATTACKED ME OUT OF NOWHERE. I DIDNT TOUCH HIM THE WHOLE GAME NOT ONCE MY FOCUS WAS ON SMOOCH AND DDD. NYOS COULD HAVE HAD A "HARD TRUCE" WITH ME, WHICH WOULD HAVE SEEMED MORE TACTICAL, JUST AS EASILY AS DDD THAT GAME, SO WHAT MADE HIM CHOOSE DDD? SINCE HE DENIED A GUARANTEED SECOND BY NOT TRUCING ME (KNOWING NYOS AND HIM=PGA), DIDNT TALK WITH NYOS THE WHOLE GAME NOR ATTACK HIM AT ALL AND VICE VERSA,SUPPOSEDLY HAVE A HARD TRUCE SOMEHOW WITHOUT TALKING AT ALL, THEN TRY TO BLAME ME LOSING ON MYSELF, IT IS OBVIOUS THAT HE IS IN A PGA WITH NYOS. TRUST ME, IF ANYONE SAW THE GAME, YOU WOULD KNOW, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTION AT ALL. PGA= DOUBLEDOGDAREYA-------NYOS

He ignored my flag because I attacked him 3 turns before. Then he made excuses as to why. Not cool.

Im not sure, but i guess he plays with some pgas in the 500 tables. He truces too easy being 5th and 6th... He uses to win too easy too, with no enemies attaking him. Im sorry if im wrong, but is what i see. And i played 6 times with you today. EDITING: I didnt post it before because he told me in the other games he didnt read and see my flag. But now its the third time he farms me flaged. He dont respect flags.