Scumbag player

backstabber. ignores flags. don't trust.

faggot

2014-09-20 ZIFT and I had a good, long game because of one of those one-land narrows. When I finally had a lead that compelled ZIFT to quit in about Round 63, I did what I usually do and quit rather than sit around to take 1st. Why stick around? I had already won the game. The following chat ensued... ---------- ZIFT: gg ---------- Urbi et Orbi: gg ---------- Urbi et Orbi: you can have 1st ---------- Urbi et Orbi: i don't care about points at all ---------- ZIFT: why ---------- Urbi et Orbi: why don't i care about points? ---------- Urbi et Orbi: because i only play the 0 tables... ---------- Urbi et Orbi: because i don't want to play on the higher tables... ---------- Urbi et Orbi: because of all the spoken and unspoken truces ---------- Urbi et Orbi: plus, the game is more fun when you forget about points ---------- ZIFT has left ++++++++++ Because ZIFT played for way longer than most people would have when he was at a 2 to 1 disadvantage, I was surprised by his surprise at my quitting. It seemed to me that ZIFT "got it"--he was playing out a losing position just for the fun of it because what if he DID win?

Very honest and good player,

idiot

Doesn't understand the game. Hopefully will pick it up soon.