Forum


eliminate the most skilled player (highest score) at the table first to increase you chance of winning
kdicefreak wrote
at 12:16 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 EST
the title says it all......

this strategy is based on the assumption that the higher score player are actually more skilled.....of course unless they earn the points by cheating.....

9 people think this is a good idea




Replies 1 - 10 of 17 Next › Last »
kdicefreak wrote
at 12:19 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 EST
*your
montecarlo wrote
at 12:20 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 EST
perhaps, offer them a truce in the chatbox. seems most of the high-score players are truce-whores and realize how critical it is to have strong friendly neighbors in order to get high scores.
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 12:37 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 EST
LEARN TO BE GOOD AT KDICE! Then you will be the highest score at a table and can pwn like the rest of us.
rnd wrote
at 3:05 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 EST
i <3 kdicefreak.
mugambo wrote
at 6:50 PM, Friday January 4, 2008 EST
I'm a truce whore. The highest bidder wins.
geoisonfire wrote
at 9:39 AM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST
"perhaps, offer them a truce in the chatbox. seems most of the high-score players are truce-whores and realize how critical it is to have strong friendly neighbors in order to get high scores."
Not really, in fact turce wouldn't be a good choice for people who wants to get more pts. I used to truce a lot back to the old days. (before Sep, 2007). But nowdays, rules changed, sometime you helped someone else but can screw yourself.
I find it is really easy to win for people who get over 1000pts to play in a table with min o pts.
However, "eliminate the most skilled player (highest score) at the table first to increase you chance of winning" does seem to be a good idea :)
¤Unique¤ wrote
at 9:51 AM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST
KdiceFreak is correct. It is best to eliminate highest score player immediately.
Vermont wrote
at 10:40 PM, Monday January 7, 2008 EST
One problem with this theory is that you are then playing specifically against one player instead of against all six.

As an example, we've all seen games where someone has tried to take revenge for past perceived wrongs, and all it does it get both players involved killed quickly, typically both for somewhere in 5th-7th.

Certainly, if a particular attack truly doesn't matter to you positionally, you hit the player who is the bigger threat to you in that particular game...it may very well be the player with the highest score...but often it may not be.

An exception to this would be if you know someone on the table is gunning for you. You may want to be a little more aggressive against that person to try to prevent it, but again its just more likely that you both do poorly.

Anyway, that's my two cents.
Avi G wrote
at 8:05 AM, Thursday January 10, 2008 EST
Vermont, you trying to say that PGEs are stupid, pointless, and ultimately just plain silly?

I'm Shocked.

And Amazed.
Vermont wrote
at 9:03 AM, Thursday January 10, 2008 EST
Actually I didn't use any of those words. Occasionally PGAs are fun and well deserved. However, they typically don't get you any points.
KDice - Multiplayer Dice War
KDice is a multiplayer strategy online game played in monthly competitions. It's like Risk. The goal is to win every territory on the map.
CREATED BY RYAN © 2006
RECOMMEND
GAMES
GPokr
Texas Holdem Poker
KDice
Online Strategy
XSketch
Online Pictionary