Forum
unknown6092648
Ryan wrote
at 12:33 AM, Friday December 15, 2006 EST |
0 people think this is a good idea
Replies 1 - 5 of 5
Ryan wrote
at 12:56 PM, Friday December 15, 2006 EST yes, new maps would be cool
but i also think its cool to play the same map again. I'm not sure what I think about this. |
jtav12 wrote
at 1:15 PM, Friday December 15, 2006 EST Yeah a couple of time is fun but after a while is boring ... I know that there is more than 1 1900 map but sometime people don't want to play that kind of map or anything ... anyway isn't that of a big deal.
|
dice_horst wrote
at 2:28 PM, Friday December 15, 2006 EST you could create some more maps and cycle them (weekly? every three days? every game? .....) with the ones that already exist... jtav is right with the 1900 maps... there should definetly be more.
|
CNE wrote
at 6:03 PM, Friday December 15, 2006 EST I like the idea of new maps. But I don't want to see existing tables remapped. I want to be able to go into a particular table knowing what kind of map it is.
How about creating a bunch of new tables & maps, then rotating them in and out for a spell? For example, have "leucaruth" stay up for 3-5 days, then is replaced by a new table (which we'll call "CNE" ;) ). The "leucaruth" table would be shuffled back into the list of active tables after 3-5 days. Or it could be a queue system, where the oldest table in play gets pushed onto the waiting list, and the next available new table gets popped into play. |
Ryan wrote
at 2:26 AM, Thursday December 21, 2006 EST I'm going to regenerate table names and maps every sunday.
|