Forum
unknown5173108
daley wrote
at 8:08 PM, Friday December 8, 2006 EST |
0 people think this is a good idea
Replies 1 - 6 of 6
mike456 wrote
at 8:12 PM, Friday December 8, 2006 EST implement a game style where the goal is not to conquer all territories, but rather to hold a particular territory for a set amount of time. alliances and team work would certainly come into play here.
|
Jon Ace wrote
at 9:40 PM, Friday December 8, 2006 EST I like it.
|
b-man wrote
at 4:44 AM, Tuesday December 12, 2006 EST I love it, would give some variance to the game. Maybe also a scenario like 3-on-3. Any other suggestions?
|
pTm wrote
at 4:22 PM, Wednesday December 13, 2006 EST I like the idea but how should the players be rated?
|
daley wrote
at 4:16 PM, Tuesday December 19, 2006 EST Different kind of games could have separate ratings. I used to play a lot at the Free Internet Chess Server (Fics). They had different ratings for standard, blitz and I think also "wild" where wild include an entire array of bizarre chess variants.
|
daley wrote
at 4:18 PM, Tuesday December 19, 2006 EST Also 2-on-2-on-2 . And there is a subvariant - that you either know or don't know how the other alliances are arranged. If you don't know the other alliances - you only know your own ally.
|