On the side somewhere you could toggle between different ways you'd like the computer to stack up your dice at the end of a turn.

ie: button 1- equal distribution
button 2- all on one stack
button 3- default

Very Good Idea, but you should also be allowed to choose which stack for "button 2"

I like this idea, plus, it doesn't take much time.This idea has been suggested many time before, but this was the first time i actually saw a solution...not to mention it wouldn't be all too hard to program

For the sake of ease I was thinking that button 2 would just add the new dice to your biggest stack.

Why do you people always want to complicate this game?
It's a dice game, so obviously luck is going to be one of, if not the biggest factor in the game, stop trying to downsize it.

I agree with Tank. I know progression is always nice, and we should certainly strive for it, but this game depends very much on luck. Taking away the random restacking takes away a part of this game.

Trust me, I've been the victim of crappy restacking many-a-time, but this just isn't something I think should happen.

First of all, I am not 'you people'. I am a person with feelings and ideas just like you, mr. stinker-pants. Yes it is a dice game, but before it is a play of randomness, it is a game of strategy. Would an online site featuring the card game 'war' be as popular? And besides, if you didn't want to use the controls, you could just leave the buttons alone and leave it set to the default setting.

However, I do see your point about the game not NEEDING anything. Its already the best game on the web (imho), but after all, this is the idea page and I've presented an idea that I think is worthy of a beta test.

If it messes up the game, than I'm all for getting rid of it.