Forum
Advisor Blog
Reviews
Strategies
Ideas
2100 tables
|
jtav13 wrote
at 1:32 PM, Tuesday January 2, 2007 EST
I realise that people don't even play that much on 1900 tables ... but i think that 2100 tables would encourage people to 1) play with there first account because the rating loss would be more light 2) to try to get there ... it would be a goal for the 1900-2000 range since it's kinda impossible for them to get to high score
|
|
MadWylli wrote
at 2:05 PM, Tuesday January 2, 2007 EST agreed give us at least one 2100 table ryan please.
|
|
fuzzycat wrote
at 2:09 PM, Tuesday January 2, 2007 EST the 2000 tables hardly ever fill up. how often will there be a 2100 game?
|
|
|
MadWylli wrote
at 6:07 PM, Tuesday January 2, 2007 EST how do you know when you never see one?
|
|
Ryan wrote
at 6:08 PM, Tuesday January 2, 2007 EST Play at the 1900 table, ratings matter half as much now.
Besides, if you lose points to a 1900 player its good... the next time you have a higher rating player to play with ;) |
|
Capt_Cracker wrote
at 10:04 PM, Tuesday January 2, 2007 EST Wait, where did the 2000 tables go? If I gotta play with these 1900 people, I'll never get over 2200 again! I proclaim "waaaah"!
this isn't sarcasm, I really am disgruntled at this :( |
|
|
jtav13 wrote
at 10:52 PM, Tuesday January 2, 2007 EST I mean the problem already existed with the 2000 tables ... I just think 2100 is the chanlange to keep good player playing and newcomer to look foward.
|
|
William Wallace wrote
at 12:45 AM, Thursday January 4, 2007 EST LOL Ryan! Lke I am going to use my 2200+ accounts at 1900 tables. Create bigger tables or every account over 2100 is going to sit and collect dust. No one is going to risk playing at 1900 tables.
|
|
Fiji wrote
at 1:20 AM, Thursday January 4, 2007 EST I say implement a -10 points per day per account. If you dont play, you lose 10 points for the day. That should compell some to play.
|
|
Tech wrote
at 5:31 AM, Thursday January 4, 2007 EST -10 strikes me as excessive. Sides, no big deal. The people up there creat a second (or third, or fourth) account, and keep playing as the scores rise. You've noticed of course, that scores are rising over time? Eventually it should take care of itself...
|
|
Spamite wrote
at 6:09 AM, Thursday January 4, 2007 EST 2100 tables need to exist otherwise people like me, i.e. top 50, will never play their accounts. Why risk it at a 1900 table?
|
