http://kdice.com/games/101119474

Here's another one for Ryan to view

They're aggressive and when luck is on their side it works. On average it seems like they don't win.

But word on the tables is that people will eventually stop playing. I think it’s good that they are made to be a bit better than humans to counteract their poor tactics but I think they’ve been weighted a bit too far in that direction.

Thought I have is they can sit anywhere with 0 points. They should have to meet at least half the required, imo.

What u on about pooch?

Bammbi, oh it's something I realized a year ago but the only one I'm talk about it with is Ryan. Until then my thoughts will be with me.

Well, if the bot is lucky the first turn it gets hard to beat it. Still, most of the games you beat the bot as it keeps on attacking -1 and that weakens it, if you live long enough.

I think it would be great to have the in-game stats of kakku-mans-theme back. Then you could see how many points per dice you averaged in each game. From a subjective perspective (the one you usually have) the bots win -1 way too often - but then, how often do you try?

Correction.

Just played 4 games vs plonkzilla. The bot did not lose a single vital n:n roll. It won >50% -1 attacks. It stacked in a manor that hand-placing the dice better would not have been possible. If that's random, I'd like a piece of it.

My luckstats: 37.4 (2 turns), 48.6 (17 turns), 42.4 (3), 46.2(6).

It certainly does not feel like a random game and you can't have a strategy, as the thing just crashes you with mostly won weird attacks in no time.

Everyone knows it’s “fixed” for the bots. As I said this would be good - to create more challenge, but it’s been overcompensated and lots of people are talking about not playing any more because of it.