Forum
NEW MODERATORS NEEDED.
|
zumo wrote
at 1:31 PM, Friday September 9, 2016 EDT
An attempt.
|
|
|
zumo wrote
at 1:32 PM, Friday September 9, 2016 EDT I recommend Dug.
|
|
TrueBlue wrote
at 7:22 PM, Friday September 9, 2016 EDT Don't you think satan will be a better choice?
|
|
Dude111 wrote
at 7:27 PM, Friday September 9, 2016 EDT I nominate anyone but me
|
|
Gurgi wrote
at 8:30 PM, Saturday September 10, 2016 EDT I'll do it with dug
|
|
bobajob wrote
at 12:53 PM, Monday September 12, 2016 EDT I'll do it. However excellent service comes at a cost, so will be offering
Bans: $5/week -chat: $2/week Other disciplinary actions by request. I think that would provide excellent value to the user community |
|
Thraxle wrote
at 3:33 PM, Monday September 12, 2016 EDT I'll come back and clean this place up in a month.
Time for the BANHAMMER to return!!! |
|
dasfury wrote
at 9:00 AM, Tuesday September 13, 2016 EDT |
|
|
dasfury wrote
at 9:01 AM, Tuesday September 13, 2016 EDT ^^ classic ^^
|
|
|
TrueBlue wrote
at 2:30 AM, Wednesday September 14, 2016 EDT It should be somebody who doesn't play. Most players have their friends and enemies and they will not be objective. It's like in a football game, you don't want one of the players to be also to referee.
|
|
getting_revolt wrote
at 2:28 PM, Wednesday September 14, 2016 EDT TrueBlue: There's one problem though รข?? someone who doesn't play would presumably have little interest in being an admin.
And if they have never been competent players (i.e. can't read the board) the situation is even worse: they couldn't recognise the subtle differences between a genuine silent truce and game-2-game alliances aka PGA. |