ye ban this timer fool for being nice when he was obv 2nd !!!!!

It didn't look like a game-2-game favour, more like a reward for teal being nice to him. He could have flagged before, but I guess he feared the flag might be countered.

I guess he had the right to give up his chance for a roll if he felt that the situation was asymmetric (teal could endanger him, but not the other way round)...

pretty much agree with flagsareweak

I do agree however that most truces should end in a roll off or a fight (whatever both agree on) but actually some truces are more of a 12 truce with one particular player being obvious 1st. Usually the player in 2nd makes an offer like "X truce? you 1st, me 2nd"

if the outcome of this game would have been the other way around (overall 1st just being gifted 1st), there would be a slight smell of funnel

funnels must have a clear intent to help someone, against the spirit and the logic of the game: trying to get someone to medal or to level up, gifting someone 1st when a player barely contributed anything in the game or simply because someone is a friend

There's no evidence of a funnel in this game. I concur with jurgen. Game to game, repetitive advantage play is a funnel. A "nicety" to your allied partner where you acknowledge you did the least work and are content to not roll and give the Clear First Place the 1st Place without a roll? That's just good etiquette IMO