I understand why it was changed to this, but I still think it's a bit too harsh.

100 table, 7 Players:

1st +250
2nd +50
3rd 0
4th 0
5th -100
6th -100
7th -100

50
-----
2 50 -50
3 75 -25 -50
4 100 0 -50 -50
5 100 0 0 -50 -50
6 125 25 0 -50 -50 -50
7 125 25 0 0 -50 -50 -50

100
-----
2 100 -100
3 150 -50 -100
4 200 0 -100 -100
5 200 0 0 -100 -100
6 250 50 0 -100 -100 -100
7 250 50 0 0 -100 -100 -100

500
-----
2 500 -500
3 750 -250 -500
4 1000 0 -500 -500
5 1000 0 0 -500 -500
6 1250 250 0 -500 -500 -500
7 1250 250 0 0 -500 -500 -500

2000
-----
2 2000 -2000
3 3000 -1000 -2000
4 4000 0 -2000 -2000
5 4000 0 0 -2000 -2000
6 5000 1000 0 -2000 -2000 -2000
7 5000 1000 0 0 -2000 -2000 -2000

5000
-----
2 5000 -5000
3 7500 -2500 -5000
4 10000 0 -5000 -5000
5 10000 0 0 -5000 -5000
6 12500 2500 0 -5000 -5000 -5000
7 12500 2500 0 0 -5000 -5000 -5000

Good.
Now it's about actually winning the game and not about flagging as soon as possible and hoping to survive others.

Ryan: 500 tables are still operating at +625 +125 0 0 -250 -250 -250 but are taking 500.

I won two 2ks today, but only got 2,7k and 3k. Hmm?

apparently, 2k tables still only take half the amount (-1000 for 4/5/6th and +2500 for 1st +- dom pts)

This just happened on a 500: "+0 for 1st".

Just had the following on 0 table

3rd +63
2nd (me) -3
1st +90

12.5k wins at 5k base w/o dom? am i to assume a standard 5k win will net 15k pts? jesus... 2 wins for 30k.. no lead is safe