Forum
quick question to anyone who is listening
|
sluthead wrote
at 12:05 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT
why cant we hold more than 32 dice in our reserve? would it be counter productive to the game somehow?
|
Replies 1 - 10 of 10
|
HanseHase wrote
at 1:10 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT yes, it would
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 1:20 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT obviously it would
|
|
kam|k2 wrote
at 1:39 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT you cant revolt against someone who has 300 dices in his stack! (;
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 2:52 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT yes you can
|
|
nuflis wrote
at 3:25 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT obviously you can
|
|
BatmanDan wrote
at 3:43 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT theyre right....you can
|
|
|
kam|k2 wrote
at 8:13 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT not very likely you gonna win it...
|
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 8:31 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT nobody was talking about winning
|
|
|
nuflis wrote
at 10:27 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT but you can
|
|
|
sluthead wrote
at 10:32 AM, Tuesday July 15, 2008 EDT i dont see why its obvious, usually you only have one or two territories connecting to any one player, i think when a player is in first and is being attacked by a truce, two players or even three. they should be able to use all the dice at there disposal. not just the 32
|
