Forum
new point distribution
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 4:34 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT
Ryan, i noticed you changed the point distribution, but i feel like its a little severe, 2nd place should still get something. +277 isnt quite enough, i think around +500 would be decent. Just my opinion, tell me if i'm missing something
|
|
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 4:46 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT those numbers are from a 2.5k game btw
|
|
opiumwhore wrote
at 5:01 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT I agree with pat on this one. You still lose the same amount for getting 7th or 6th. and when you do well, you get shit for 2nd. Change it back!
|
|
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 5:01 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT Or! better idea: can we wait till next month to implement this scoring? Im doing well with the other one : /
|
|
CsokaEndre wrote
at 5:40 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT Where can I find the point distribution system?
|
|
ltsply2 wrote
at 5:45 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT you can't... it's the fun of the game. you never know how it'll be scored and it'll change mid-month. oh, and if you complain you'll be reset. have fun!
|
|
Ryan wrote
at 7:02 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT oops, this was a mistake, I didn't mean to put this in, I'll update tonight to revert back.
|
|
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 7:11 PM, Saturday March 22, 2008 EDT cool, thanks man
|
|
|
CsokaEndre wrote
at 7:40 AM, Sunday March 23, 2008 EDT Scoring system is an elemental part of the rules. I will not play any more while the rules are not clarified.
|
|
TheBetterYodel wrote
at 11:46 PM, Wednesday February 10, 2010 EST Obviously this was a lie!
|
|
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 11:49 PM, Wednesday February 10, 2010 EST uhh, what was?
|
