Un-ban RND.

What, are you looking to completely update/overhaul kdice?

Well, if anything, try making the map coloring more modern, if that's the right term for it. It just look really bland to me. In Flash CS3 and Flash 8 there's a whole bunch of kinda flashy things you can do with coloring. I basically just want you to jazz up kdice a bit, if that makes any sense at all.

Also, I don't really know what you mean by wanting "feedback about the future of this game". Are you asking us what we want kdice to be like in the future, or are you looking for ideas on the site's layout, what? Give us some examples of what you mean.

Do you mean like having minigames or a new scoring system, or smaller things such as aesthetics, as in button/territory rollover effects.

By the way, you may actually want to consult a professional product development firm about this, depending on what the "ideas" are that you are looking for.

Not sure what you mean by "Whores", Ryan. Could you confirm wether you mean...

the ones who PLAY for points or

the ones who PAY for points?

For the former, I'll think anbout it over the weekend. For the latter, you could start by only allowing donation points to count at the start of the month.

Point whores like people who PGA for points or take advantage of the multiple transaction thing to pay for points. But regardless, I don't really care about these people but I do care about everyone else. I'm sure there's some good ideas out there.


(bigger ideas than changing the colors)

http://kdice.com/ideas/ideas/44762239

Islands! Please check out my idea about islands, Ryan. Thanks.

kdice should have islands. These islands, if conquered completely by a player, would guarantee the player to conquers that island(s), a guaranteed spot placement (e.g. nothing lower than fifth place). The players who would be on the island would be random (a maximum of 2-3 players on that island, to prevent any PGA from happening).

This bonus of rank can be forfeited in the later rounds if the player wants to attach the island to the main land. However, they would not be allowed to choose where the attachment takes place. This would occur if any player does not choose the flag option, in true last player standing style).

Thus, the purpose of "islanding" is not to win the game (the points gained would be minimal), but as a defensive measure of not losing considerably. Similar of having reserves, but only active if the player is in dire circumstances.

Two islands could battle each other, creating a game within a game. Although these islands would be considerable smaller than the main standard land, it would provide more dynamics in terms of strategies.

For example, what if two players both flag for 3rd place, but are at opposite ends of the map? If both players choose to fight it out, an island would be created for them to fight for 3rd spot, rather than letting 1st or 2nd place players take away land from them.

You could also donate land from an island and allocate it to the main land, but, by doing so, you would be randomly removed 1-2 lands for getting the donation.

There are other ideas for island usage. Feel free to contribute your ideas for islanding.

Beer Me!

kdice should have islands. These islands, if conquered completely by a player, would guarantee the player to conquers that island(s), a guaranteed spot placement (e.g. nothing lower than fifth place). The players who would be on the island would be random (a maximum of 2-3 players on that island, to prevent any PGA from happening).

This bonus of rank can be forfeited in the later rounds if the player wants to attach the island to the main land. However, they would not be allowed to choose where the attachment takes place. This would occur if any player does not choose the flag option, in true last player standing style).

Thus, the purpose of "islanding" is not to win the game (the points gained would be minimal), but as a defensive measure of not losing considerably. Similar of having reserves, but only active if the player is in dire circumstances.

Two islands could battle each other, creating a game within a game. Although these islands would be considerable smaller than the main standard land, it would provide more dynamics in terms of strategies.

For example, what if two players both flag for 3rd place, but are at opposite ends of the map? If both players choose to fight it out, an island would be created for them to fight for 3rd spot, rather than letting 1st or 2nd place players take away land from them.

You could also donate land from an island and allocate it to the main land, but, by doing so, you would be randomly removed 1-2 lands for getting the donation.

There are other ideas for island usage. Feel free to contribute your ideas for islanding.

Beer Me!

kdice should have islands. These islands, if conquered completely by a player, would guarantee the player to conquers that island(s), a guaranteed spot placement (e.g. nothing lower than fifth place). The players who would be on the island would be random (a maximum of 2-3 players on that island, to prevent any PGA from happening).

This bonus of rank can be forfeited in the later rounds if the player wants to attach the island to the main land. However, they would not be allowed to choose where the attachment takes place. This would occur if any player does not choose the flag option, in true last player standing style).

Thus, the purpose of "islanding" is not to win the game (the points gained would be minimal), but as a defensive measure of not losing considerably. Similar of having reserves, but only active if the player is in dire circumstances.

Two islands could battle each other, creating a game within a game. Although these islands would be considerable smaller than the main standard land, it would provide more dynamics in terms of strategies.

For example, what if two players both flag for 3rd place, but are at opposite ends of the map? If both players choose to fight it out, an island would be created for them to fight for 3rd spot, rather than letting 1st or 2nd place players take away land from them.

You could also donate land from an island and allocate it to the main land, but, by doing so, you would be randomly removed 1-2 lands for getting the donation.

There are other ideas for island usage. Feel free to contribute your ideas for islanding.

Beer Me!

kdice should have islands. These islands, if conquered completely by a player, would guarantee the player to conquers that island(s), a guaranteed spot placement (e.g. nothing lower than fifth place). The players who would be on the island would be random (a maximum of 2-3 players on that island, to prevent any PGA from happening).

This bonus of rank can be forfeited in the later rounds if the player wants to attach the island to the main land. However, they would not be allowed to choose where the attachment takes place. This would occur if any player does not choose the flag option, in true last player standing style).

Thus, the purpose of "islanding" is not to win the game (the points gained would be minimal), but as a defensive measure of not losing considerably. Similar of having reserves, but only active if the player is in dire circumstances.

Two islands could battle each other, creating a game within a game. Although these islands would be considerable smaller than the main standard land, it would provide more dynamics in terms of strategies.

For example, what if two players both flag for 3rd place, but are at opposite ends of the map? If both players choose to fight it out, an island would be created for them to fight for 3rd spot, rather than letting 1st or 2nd place players take away land from them.

You could also donate land from an island and allocate it to the main land, but, by doing so, you would be randomly removed 1-2 lands for getting the donation.

There are other ideas for island usage. Feel free to contribute your ideas for islanding.

Beer Me!

Sorry about the reposts. I was drunk... umm... OH YEAH! :b