A vote for this is also a vote for "It is up to Ryan how winners are decided"

(For example: when you attack mine and I am attacking someone else from my location)

PS: spelling should be
"Simultaneous Mode"

this works

How about we invent a whole new game? AGAINST IT!

If I wanted to play a Real-Time Strategy, I'd play Warcraft 3.

Actually, a new game wouldn't be bad. what would it be? l-wars? j-go? s-cards?

CNE: not real time, turn based simultaneous. Nobody goes first and nobody goes last.

I guess this would be a good and interesting game.

Do we have one attack per turn or many?

How do reinforcements work? 1/4 or 1/3 of number of territories? Even if many attacks are allowed, you won't be able to attack A->B->C in one turn anyway, so it makes sense for reinforcements to be fewer.

Resolving battles is the easy bit. The only change is if two armies both attack each other, and there is a tie. In that case I suggest both lose half and stay put.