Forum
Advisor Blog
Reviews
Strategies
Ideas
Tables for each "Hundred" reached
|
Kenjamin wrote
at 1:32 PM, Sunday December 17, 2006 EST
I think there should be minimum tables for 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800 and 1900... maybe this would make for too many tables but i hate having a rating in the 1690's and then having to play against people at just above 1500 because even if I get 3rd my rating drops like 40 points... a little more flexibility in minumum ratings would help with that.
|
Replies 1 - 4 of 4
|
Tech wrote
at 2:15 PM, Sunday December 17, 2006 EST Pff, you're complaining about the 1500-1699 gap? The three hundred above it is the one that sucks...
To be honest, I wouldn't mind say, a table every two humdred, but I can live the current system. |
|
|
Kenjamin wrote
at 4:43 PM, Sunday December 17, 2006 EST I was using it as an example... I hate all of them.
|
|
dice_horst wrote
at 5:47 PM, Sunday December 17, 2006 EST 200 would be fine... but the 300 gap is kind of a thrill though, isn't it?
|
|
Jait wrote
at 2:24 PM, Monday December 18, 2006 EST theres no players on the 2k+ tables... just make it 1500, 1700, 1900, 2100 ... thats fairer inmo and more games will be available to ppl that have >2000 ;-) .. it sometime takes 15-20 min to get a game when ur over 2000
|
