Forum
Just the winner should get points
|
mmcool wrote
at 9:04 AM, Saturday July 9, 2011 EDT
What would be wrong, if just the winner(1st) get 1 point and everyone else nothing and no tables with pionts anymore and people can just flag out as last! And people with most wins get on the top 100 at last.
Why should it not be so, everybody would think about his moves and pga would'nt make any sense. |
|
mmcool wrote
at 9:08 AM, Saturday July 9, 2011 EDT and proxy cheater also would be bored after 100 games with themself :P
|
|
mmcool wrote
at 9:20 AM, Saturday July 9, 2011 EDT or maybe the points just result from (wins/games), so if you win 56 times with 150 games you get 56/150 = 0.373 and 1 is the best point(if you win all your games, what not happens) and if two people have 37% the guy with less games get a better ranking
|
|
mmcool wrote
at 9:26 AM, Saturday July 9, 2011 EDT or the monthly table is a combination of them both(wins and the % of wins)
|
|
Gurgi wrote
at 1:06 PM, Saturday July 9, 2011 EDT shut the fuck up.
but i do agree people fighting for anything besides first is dumb. |
|
ProxyCheater wrote
at 1:16 AM, Sunday July 10, 2011 EDT I think the most obvious flaw with this is that many/most people would just look at their start and flag out if it wasn't great--just like a lot of people do when they start the month at zero points and can't go down.
You'd end up with the relative start strengths being overweighted, because the people with crappy starts wouldn't even try. Getting to top 100 would make this even more likely--the way to get there is to flag out as quickly as possible unless you have a really strong start--more games quickly = more strong starts = more wins = more points. PGA would still have the same incentive, people would still help each other, and just alternate who "won". RCs would be harder to catch as well, because the non-winning PGAer could flag out 7th or whatever place with no point penalty over taking 2nd. I don't see how that would help matters with PGA. I'm all for more people fighting for 1st, but having no difference at all between 2nd and 7th would be very problematic. |
|
Gurgi wrote
at 2:15 AM, Sunday July 10, 2011 EDT i think i covered everything you said with my "shut the fuck up"
|
|
People Of The Su wrote
at 2:57 AM, Sunday July 10, 2011 EDT Hey watch out gurgi isn't that offensive behavior? You could be banned.
|
|
People Of The Su wrote
at 3:00 AM, Sunday July 10, 2011 EDT Also I think it's good that people are still trying to think of better scoring systems than the point funneling/farming/pga friendly one we have now.
It would be nice to see people be more supportive. |
|
{A}Monkey SLayer wrote
at 4:57 AM, Sunday July 10, 2011 EDT You should only be able to flag out.
In addition to that, I came up with something to reward killing: everybody starts out with a few extra points (something like 50 in a 500) that are given to whoever kills you; if you flag out yourself, you get to keep them. If you kill someone who has already killed someone, you get all the "kill points" they already had. This way flagging out instead of bs flagging behind someone stupid enough not to kill you looks more appealing, as does killing the said bs flagger. |
|
mmcool wrote
at 5:21 AM, Sunday July 10, 2011 EDT i allow gurgi to say to me shut up. I hope he? don't get banned.
@slayer but it would made lot of bounty hunters and people start to help someone getting first to get the points of someone else @proxy: this is why i say a better ranking for more wins in less games! in this case pga don't make sense bc you go down in ranking if you don't get 1st |